Oxford University Press's
Academic Insights for the Thinking World

Ready to explore the unknown

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN has already delivered more high energy data this year than it had in 2015. To put this in numbers, the LHC has produced 6.5 fb-1, compared to 4.2 fb-1 last year, where fb-1 represents one inverse femtobarn, the unit used to evaluate the data sample size. This was achieved in less than two months compared to five months of operation last year.

With this data at hand, and the projected 20-30 fb-1 by November, both the ATLAS and CMS experiments can now explore new territories and, among other things, cross-check the intriguing events they reported having found at the end of 2015. If this particular effect is confirmed, it would reveal the presence of a new particle with a mass of 750 GeV, six times the mass of the Higgs boson. Unfortunately, there was not enough data in 2015 to get a clear answer. The LHC had a slow restart last year following two years of major improvements to raise its energy reach. But if the current performance continues, the discovery potential will increase tremendously. All that is to say that everyone is keeping their fingers crossed.

The total amount of data delivered in 2016 at an energy of 13 TeV to the experiments by the LHC (blue graph) and recorded by the ATLAS experiment (yellow graph) as of 23 June. Source: ATLAS experiment.
The total amount of data delivered in 2016 at an energy of 13 TeV to the experiments by the LHC (blue graph) and recorded by the ATLAS experiment (yellow graph) as of 23 June. Public domain via ATLAS experiment.

If any new particle were found, it would open the doors to bright new horizons in particle physics. Unlike the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012, if the LHC experiments discover an anomaly or a new particle, it would bring a new understanding of the basic constituents of matter and how they interact. The Higgs boson was the last missing piece of the current theoretical model, called the Standard Model. This model can no longer accommodate new particles. However, it has been known for decades that this model is flawed, but so far, theorists have been unable to predict which theory should replace it, and experimentalists have failed to find the slightest concrete signs from a broader theory. We need new experimental evidence to move forward.

Although the new data is already being reconstructed and calibrated, it will remain “blinded” until close to 3 August, the opening date of the International Conference on High Energy Physics. This means that until then, the region where this new particle could be remains masked to prevent biasing the data reconstruction process. The same selection criteria that were used for last year’s data will then be applied to the new data. If a similar excess is still observed at 750 GeV in the 2016 data, the presence of a new particle will make no doubt.

Even if this particular excess turns out to be just a statistical fluctuation, which is always possible since physics obeys statistical laws, there is enough data to explore a wealth of possibilities. Everyone knows there is something beyond the Standard Model. But no one knows if we will luck out and at long last find the first evidence for it this summer. The good news though is that there is enough data at hand to explore new phenomena. Meanwhile, you can follow the LHC activities live or watch CMS and ATLAS data samples grow.

Featured image: Particles abstract glass by gr8effect. Public domain via Pixabay.

A version of this post originally appeared on Quantum Diaries.

Recent Comments

  1. Mark Goldes

    Recent efforts and topology-based analysis by Ken Rauen and Bill Harrington not only explain the new particle, but further expected it to be exactly where it was discovered – based upon the data from ATLAS itself, their peak on the curve seems to be at 733 GeV. Their analysis expected it at 736.8 GeV. The magnitude of 750 GeV found no support in their math.

    Rauen has written a draft paper describing Temporal Wave Mechanics (TWM) their alternative to the Standard Model that predicted the anomaly which supports the new particle.

    TWM supplements Quantum Mechanics and parallels the 11 dimensions of String Theory through completely different processes, yet confirms Einstein.

    From the point of view of TWM’s unique work in topologies, the function of the anomaly is an inverted and imaginary reflection of the electron. For copies of the TWM paper: mark@aesopenergy.com

Comments are closed.