Oxford University Press's
Academic Insights for the Thinking World

Wine and DNA profiling

Since the advent of DNA profiling of grape varieties in 1993, classical ampelography (gr. ámpelos=vine and lógos=study) has been significantly shaken up. Here is a short overview of the impact of DNA studies on wine:

Wrong labelling

In ampelographic collections, about ten living plants of each grape variety or clone are kept alive for future studies or plantings, which requires a large amount of time and money. Yet, in every collection we estimate an average of 5% of labelling errors. They can now be identified with DNA profiling and duplicates can be eliminated, thus saving time and money.

For example, at the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Clonal Germplasm at Davis in California, Mondeuse Noire from Savoy (France) was long confused with Refosco dal Peduncolo Rosso from Friuli (Italy). Thanks to DNA testing that false identification was put to an end.

In Australia, the grape variety imported from Spain and spread under the name Albariño turned out to be an earlier labelling error in a collection in Galicia (Spain), as it was recently identified as the Savagnin Blanc, to the chagrin of producers who had to correct their marketing strategy. (While I understand the promotion issue, I find this rather good news given the high esteem that I have for the wines made of Savagnin, especially Heida from Switzerland and Vin Jaune from the Jura!)

Synonyms and homonyms

DNA profiling can unexpectedly identify or reject synonyms. For example, the famous Zinfandel from California was long suspected to be identical to Primitivo from Puglia (Italy), which was confirmed by DNA profiling. After a long DNA research nicknamed the “Zinquest”, it was established in 2001 that this variety is native to the Dalmatian coast where it is unofficially called Crljenak Kaštelanski. More recently, in 2011, DNA profiling of a 90-year-old herbarium sample from Dalmatia enabled the identification of the official and historical name of this grape variety: Tribidrag.

Another example, Altesse from Savoy (France) has long been identified with Furmint from the Tokaj region in Hungary, which was conclusively refuted by DNA testing.

Gouais Blanc, the “mother of all grapes”. Photo courtesy of José Vouillamoz.

The same name can be inadvertently given to different varieties, resulting in what we call homonyms. For example, in Spain several varieties are all called ‘Albillo Something’; the same happens in several countries with ‘Barbarossa Something’ and ‘Schiava Something’ in Italy; and ‘Muscat Something’ or ‘Malvasia Something’ in a number of Mediterranean countries. Yet in many cases these different varieties are in fact not genetically related. Thanks to DNA profiling, these homonym confusions can be solved.


DNA paternity testing has revealed several unexpected parentages. The first and most surprising was discovered in 1997 by Prof Carole Meredith and her PhD student John Bowers at the University of California in Davis; Cabernet Sauvignon was shown to be a natural, spontaneous crossing between Cabernet Franc and Sauvignon Blanc, which no one had ever suspected. Since then, other parentage discoveries have debunked some popular legends and have shed some light on the true origins of famous grape varieties: Merlot is a half-brother of Cabernet Sauvignon, because it was found to be a spontaneous progeny of Cabernet Franc and an almost extinct variety named Magdeleine Noire des Charentes; Chardonnay and Gamay from Burgundy are two brothers born from natural crossings between Pinot and Gouais Blanc, the latter an obscure variety that has been banned in France since several centuries; Syrah is a natural offspring of Dureza from Ardèche and Mondeuse Blanche from Savoy; Sangiovese is half Tuscan and half Calabrian since it is a natural progeny of the Chianti grape variety Ciliegiolo and Calabrese di Montenuovo, an obscure variety from Calabria, etc. Last but not least, the parentage of Tempranillo, the most important variety in Spain, was discovered after the release of our book Wine Grapes (co-authored with Jancis Robionson and Julia Harding).

Some books will tell you that Tempranillo was introduced into Spain by the Cistercian monks of the Abbey of Cîteaux in Burgundy, and that it is possibly a distant cousin of Pinot which took the pilgrim route to Santiago de Compostela. I suggest that you close these books. In 2012 this legend was invalidated with the discovery of the parents of Tempranillo; it is a natural crossing between Albillo Mayor, an old variety form Ribera del Duero where Tempranillo is historically known as Tinta del País (red of the land), and an obscure and almost extinct variety from Aragon called Benedicto, of which we practically know nothing. The crossing must have taken place somewhere between Aragon, Rioja, Castile and León and Navarre, before the first mention of Tempranillo in Rioja in 1807.

Classical ampelography and DNA profiling are complementary sciences whose synergy allows us to better understand the migrations of grape varieties, as well as their kinship, providing a better understanding of the future of wine growing.

Recent Comments

  1. Kathy

    Aren’t Chardonnay & Gamay the offspring of Pinot Noir & Gouais Blanc rather than Pinot Blanc & Gouais Blanc?

  2. […] is not quite so old in Georgia, but still pretty old. But will they be able to genotype […]

  3. Sinisa Boskovic

    First, I enjoy reading and I highly respect Wine Grapes: The most complete guide to vine varieties and their wines ever.
    On the other hand, I question the accuracy of the statement, “Tribidrag is the oldest name for this variety” and further decision to adopt the name of Tribidrag for Zinfandel grapes (stated on page 1087 of Wine Grapes, published 2012). Why?
    The origin of California’s Zinfandel remains the subject of much speculation. Why?
    FACT: Kratosija, the grape variety from Monte Negro, depicts an identical genetic fingerprint as Tribidrag, Zinfandel, and Primitivo.
    FACT: The OLDEST written document that first mentions the Kratosija grape was published in The Medieval Statute of Budva in the time period between April 25, 1426 and April 25, 1431: cap. CCLXI. De vigne de Cratosia. (Budva is a port town in Monte Negro).
    FACT: The oldest record of Tribidrag’s name ocurred in 1488, according to the study of trading archives of Venice (Article: The mystery of Zinfandel grape published on May 12, 2017 by Jancis Robinson).
    Budva lost its independence to Venice in 1442. The Kratosija name established itself fifty years prior to the mentioning of the Tribidrag name and the loss of independence to Venice. The establishment of the Kratosija name occured in the independent city-state of Budva in the early 1400s, while the mentioning of the Tribidrag name occured in Dalmatia under Venetian control in the late 1400s.

    In conclusion, the Wine Grapes statement on page 1087, “According to the rule of anteriority, whereby the oldest name takes precedence, Tribidrag is adopted here as the prime name for this variety” proves to be false.
    Sinisa Boskovic

Comments are closed.