Today is an exciting day at the OUPblog. We are gearing up to launch our newest column which will appear for the first time tomorrow. Casper Grathwohl, Reference Publisher for OUP-USA and the Academic Division in Oxford, has graciously agreed to be the “opening-act” and introduce the impetus behind our newest column. Check out what Casper has to say below. Be sure to come back tomorrow and read From A To Zimmer!
Earlier this year Oxford introduced a new look to its dictionaries—a “refresh” of our classic design. One of the new elements you’ll notice is a little logo on the cover of every dictionary with the words “Powered by the Oxford Corpus” next to it. Intriguing. Most people have probably never heard of a corpus. So why are we making such a big deal of it? Well, the story of the Oxford English Corpus sits at the heart of our ability to track language and reflect real language usage—by real speakers—in our dictionaries.
The corpus is a carefully selected electronic repository of more than 1.5 billion words pulled from newspapers, blogs, magazines, scientific papers, journals, books, websites, transcripts from television and radio, and many other print, online, and spoken English sources from around the world. Together this content is representative of our living language, and Oxford lexicographers analyze it to build the most sophisticated and accurate dictionary content of any publisher in the world. We can tell how the various uses of the noun “terror” have shifted in the United States after 9/11. Through its collocations—the words that most often come before or after—we discovered that the verb “to cause” is used far more often to denote negative events (such as “to cause a flood”) than positive ones. These are just a few examples of the nuances of our language that Oxford lexicographers are tracking when building new dictionary data.
And why is this important? Because when it comes to language, precision is power. The more exact you can be in asking for something, the better chance you have of getting just what you asked for. It’s that simple. Language is evolving at an ever-increasing clip, and if we’re not keeping up—employing hundreds of lexicographers using tools like the corpus—there’s no way you’re going to be able to. I’m not a lexicographer myself, but I’ve spent time poking around the corpus, playing with the tools and uncovering examples of how you are playing with the language. I can tell you that it is awesome. I’ve been lost in it for hours. And we’re the only dictionary publisher with a corpus this rich and expansive. Anyone can cut and paste a bunch of articles or blogs into a database, but we hand-select a representative balance of sources—online and print, British and American, spoken and written—to ensure the accuracy and currency of every definition our lexicographers write. The Oxford English Corpus is part of our ongoing commitment as your guide to the English language, and that’s why we’re highlighting it on the cover of every one of our dictionaries.
But I’m not writing just to tell you about the Oxford English Corpus, I’m also here to introduce a new online column appearing on the OUP blog by American lexicographer Ben Zimmer. Ben is an editor in Oxford’s New York office and his column will attempt to capture something of the daily life of the English language. And he has the Oxford English Corpus as a tool to back up his riffs. How does a word make it into the dictionary? What “Bushisms” will really last beyond W’s tenure in office? I’ve read Ben’s first column and I can tell you it’s just the right blend of serious language discussion and interesting cultural commentary—perfect for all of us armchair linguists. Enjoy the column folks.
[…] Rebecca OUP-US Today we are proud to present Ben Zimmer’s first installment in his new column, From A To Zimmer. To read more about the column click here. […]
line 4, impetuous??? what, no copy editor on the blog’s opening day?
Did you mean “impetus”, not “impetuous”?
Sorry! Even I make mistakes!
[…] we perhaps being too hard on miniscule? Lexicographers here at OUP can consult the Oxford English Corpus to see just how accepted this spelling has become. In our hardly minuscule collection of […]
[…] to be considered nonstandard errors, albeit creative ones. As with minuscule vs. miniscule, the Oxford English Corpus is a valuable tool for determining whether a particular eggcorn is a flash in the pan or here to […]
[…] of simply guessing at which coinages might come up, what are word-hunters to do? Once again the Oxford English Corpus comes to the rescue. The Corpus can be analyzed with search tools that let us see which pieces of […]
I gather the corpus is not available to scholars other than those working on OUP projects. Correct?
[…] is obvious that Oxford is looking to invest heavily in the OEC brand. Rebecca over at OUP notes that the “Powered by Oxford Corpus” is showing up on all the new Oxford […]
[…] Language” column to a subject that should be familiar to readers of this column: the Oxford English Corpus and the fascinating things that it tells us about our changing language. Among Erin’s […]
[…] thing becomes quite obvious when looking at a large corpus of online texts (whether it’s the Oxford English Corpus or the rough-and-ready corpus of webpages indexed by Google or another search engine): writers are […]
[…] get a sense of how pejoratively the word mob is used in contemporary English, I took a look at the Oxford English Corpus, in order to see what sort of lexical crowd mob hangs out with. For instance, the Corpus can say […]
Is it possible to buy an access to Oxford English Corpus. I’m working on a book and I need the 100 most commonest words, 200 most commonest words and so on. The same for Oxford 3000. Thanking you in advance. Adam
[…] mean the scientists will actually use these words very often, though. Looking through the Oxford English Corpus for long words, I found a 39-letter word that does seem to be used regularly in scientific […]
Comments are closed.