Oxford University Press's
Academic Insights for the Thinking World

There are two different types of Jane Austen fans

There is a theory current among many of my fellow Janeites about what kind of a Jane Austen devotee one can be. Either, it is said, one unreservedly cleaves to the Austen of Pride and Prejudice and Emma, or one emphatically embraces the Austen of Persuasion and Sense and Sensibility. One cannot love both, not equally, not without reservations about one or the other set of works, even if one likes and admires all of Austen’s writing.

I place myself squarely in the second camp. Persuasion is my favorite Austen novel. I have always found Anne Elliot Austen’s most endearing heroine, and Captain Wentworth by far the most attractive romantic interest (not a rich snob, not a parson, not annoyingly overburdened with a sense of his own rectitude). I delight in the novel’s subtle inclination toward utilitarianism and its depiction of the relationship between equals exemplified by Admiral and Mrs. Croft.

I have to wonder, however, about the difference between the two aforementioned targets for Janeite affection. Is it to be found in the contrast between the relative extroversion and introversion of the novels’ heroines, or perhaps in the degrees to which Humean pride and humility govern their respective characters (I will just note here that Hume has a bit of a soft spot for pride and would probably like Emma quite a lot)? Is it to be found in the reader’s tendency to empathize or identify with one set of traits rather than another? This latter suggestion strikes me as unlikely. While I enjoy all of Austen’s novels, I don’t like Emma’s mistakes or the fictional fact that she is so often wrong (at other people’s expense, rather than just her own). Of course, I suspect that this reaction is largely due to the not-at-all-fictional fact that I am more likely to make mistakes of that kind (and therefore to wince at their depiction). I clearly do identify with Emma, I just like her less than Anne.

On one memorable occasion, I took one of those “Which Austen character are you?” personality tests (I stand ready to construct another, much better test of this sort, the moment someone offers me a substantial sum of money to do it) only to discover that I was Mary Crawford of Mansfield Park, certainly as far from the self-effacing Anne Elliot as one could possibly be. Probably it was an accurate test, as such things go, but such a finding certainly jettisons any notion of preference based on identification with the protagonists of the novels at issue.

The heroines of these novels are near opposites, but each novel provides the same clear, strong focus on issues involving autonomy and autonomous agency. They just do so from diametrically opposed perspectives.

My tentative hypothesis about the aforementioned disparity in Janeite tastes is based on a few philosophical considerations. Consider Emma and Persuasion in particular. Emma was begun in 1814 and completed in 1815, during which year Persuasion was begun. Persuasion was completed in 1816 and published posthumously in 1817. The heroines of these novels are near opposites, but each novel provides the same clear, strong focus on issues involving autonomy and autonomous agency. They just do so from diametrically opposed perspectives.

Consider that much of Emma concerns, as Gilbert Ryle would have it, the issue of solicitude. Emma Woodhouse interferes in the lives of others and influences their decision making, often to ill effect. She is herself, on the other hand, given that she is overconfident and fond of her own way, quite difficult to influence. It is only through seeing her mistakes and understanding what produced them that she relinquishes her inclination to orchestrate other people’s lives and begins to accept occasional advice about her own. Anne Elliot, on the other hand, is too easily influenced by others. She lacks confidence. She allows her decisions to be swayed by others in a way that is contrary to her happiness because she is inclined to distrust her own impulses and choices. Anne Elliot, that is, is on the receiving end of the kind of treatment that Emma Woodhouse doles out. Anne’s father is vain and profligate and will never heed her advice, while Mr. Woodhouse is placid and risk-aversive and entirely dependent on Emma. Emma has been the mistress of her household since her mother died. Anne has been largely ignored and neglected since her mother’s death, and can exert no corrective influence on her relations. We have two motherless young women, each with siblings who are entirely unlike them in character, each confronted with the important issue of independence and autonomy: their own, and that of others in what Hume would call their narrow circle. Emma acts on others while Anne is acted on. Emma profits in the end from the acquisition of a modicum of humility, while Anne profits from the acquisition of a certain self-confidence and pride.

Perhaps the kind of preference which Austen lovers are wont to note involves a preference for one or the other of the following: an interest in forging independence or an interest in respecting that of others, an interest in self-development and autonomous agency, or an interest in recognizing and respecting the boundaries of others. Emma and Persuasion are both stories of change and self-development and maturation, one chronicling a turning inward and self reflection, the next describing a turning outward and a venturing forth into the world.

Featured image credit: Royal Crescent 1829 by Unknown. Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Recent Comments

  1. Maria Mortimer

    I find that absolutely rubbish. I’m a huge Jane Austen fan, and I’m talking re-reading the books loads of times and watching every single adaptation there is obsessively and I’m both a P&P and Persuasion fan. To me they’re the best two stories, with the best heroines and the most intense/devoted men. As for Emma and Sense and Sensibility, I tend to prefer the latter, but I also adore Mr Knightley as well.

  2. Alecia

    My favorite book is Persuasion, I also very much like the heroine of her incomplete novel, Sanditon. I love Pride & Prejudice, but Emma, for me, is behind Jane’s satirical novel, Northanger Abbey, & my least favorite Austen novel is Sense & Sensibility. I don’t think your categorization of Janeites is inclusive enough to cover all the variations around.

  3. Sherrie

    My two favorites are Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility. I also have a fondness for Lady Susan, it is very naughty. So, your theory is a bit off for me.

  4. Lori Mulligan Davis

    In what camp are you if your favorite (okay, bordering on obsession) Austen is “Mansfield Park”?

  5. Lpuise

    Doesn’t apply to me. Persuasion is my favou rite, Sense and Sensibility the one I like least. I like Emma much better than S & S. Also I don’t think.Mr Woodhouse is placid, he is a very jumpy, anxious man.

  6. Jane Austen News - Issue 146

    […] The full article can be accessed here. […]

  7. Marg

    I disagree with this article entirely. My two favourite Austen novels are shared equally in favour: Persuasion and Pride and Prejudice. Emma is one of my least favourite along with Northanger Abbey. Lady Susan comes in closely behind the first two in terms of satire and comedy.

  8. Jacob Mueller

    What in the world is this background picture in reference to?

  9. QNPoohBear

    Persuasion and Pride and Prejudice are my favorites too. I’m not a fan of Emma. She really is a heroine only her creator can love. Sense & Sensibility ranks third on my list, then Emma, Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park.

  10. […] JSTOR Daily about Austen’s subtle but masterful use of language.  The OUPblog also had an interesting article about Jane Austen fans.  Finally I found this recent list from Mental Floss […]

  11. […] Oxford University Press’s blog, philosopher and literary scholar E.M. Dadlez declares “there are two types of Jane Austen fans.” She places the dividing line between die-hard Pride and Prejudice fans on one hand, and Emma and […]

  12. Dr Bill Hughes

    Thought-provoking about the centrality of autonomy and a good linking of Emma and Persuasion. The starting point of two kinds of fans is a good entry point perhaps but not really convincing, as people’s testimony in the comments show

  13. Jen

    I agree with the opposites between Emma and Anne… Austen’s own life experiences influenced her writing tremendously. The further she went in life the more dependent upon the whims of others she became! I believe her novels reflect the change in her own outlook as she went from a young girl with life before her to a middle-aged, ill woman who, in retrospect, understands the nuances and difficulties of women in 19th C England! She had very little choice regarding most important decisions which reflects Anne’s own struggles as the second daughter of a gentleman of little means and no husband! The evolution of her books are a clear result of her own experiences, yet her genius is always evident, from Lady Susan (written at 17 years of age) to Persuasion (published posthumously). I love all her writings because they evidence the change in her own perceptions as she has to navigate in a world that was completely frustrating to her! PS-I don’t like Emma Woodhouse, either! But she was definitely a product of her environment! Austen understood rich, spoiled girls very well!

  14. Susan

    Utterly ridiculous. I adore P&P & very much dislike Emma. The older I got, the more I feel that S&S was also meant to be satirical – certainly Marianne is a parody? But I have no idea how you decided to pair these novels or their readers. Did you throw darts at a chart?

  15. Eva Dadlez

    Cheers, all. This is Eva Dadlez, responding to some of the criticisms above. As indicated at the outset, the “two kinds” hypothesis isn’t mine. It is something I ran across at interdisciplinary conferences in the course of which Jane Austen aficionados were willing to speak to an analytic philosopher. It does apply to those people who informed me of it, to me, and to others. Think of the above essay as one possible explanation of that kind of preference where it DOES exist, not a pronouncement of a truth universally acknowledged.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *