<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stay-at-home dads aren’t as new as you think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2013/01/stay-at-home-dad-imperial-russia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2013/01/stay-at-home-dad-imperial-russia/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Moffatt</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2013/01/stay-at-home-dad-imperial-russia/#comment-338502</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Moffatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=33408#comment-338502</guid>
		<description>Surely you don&#039;t equate Russian nobility exercising imperial prerogative in this single case with &quot;stay at home dad&quot; as a cultural and social phenomenon? Tenuous at best.  While interesting, it&#039;s an extreme outlier and very much isolated. It really serves only to illustrate the norm, which was the precise opposite. The current &quot;stay at home dad&quot; phenomenon is a trend; growing, indicative (of what we&#039;re not totally sure yet...) and wide-spread enough for societies to remark upon it.  And occasionally celebrate it. [And please don&#039;t see these remarks as disparagement of women&#039;s historical and social gains and struggles; I&#039;m not talking about those.] 
-- from a SAHD of 17 years (who occasionally wonders what it might be like to be manorial gentry, Russian or otherwise)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely you don&#8217;t equate Russian nobility exercising imperial prerogative in this single case with &#8220;stay at home dad&#8221; as a cultural and social phenomenon? Tenuous at best.  While interesting, it&#8217;s an extreme outlier and very much isolated. It really serves only to illustrate the norm, which was the precise opposite. The current &#8220;stay at home dad&#8221; phenomenon is a trend; growing, indicative (of what we&#8217;re not totally sure yet&#8230;) and wide-spread enough for societies to remark upon it.  And occasionally celebrate it. [And please don't see these remarks as disparagement of women's historical and social gains and struggles; I'm not talking about those.]<br />
&#8211; from a SAHD of 17 years (who occasionally wonders what it might be like to be manorial gentry, Russian or otherwise)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2013/01/stay-at-home-dad-imperial-russia/#comment-338442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=33408#comment-338442</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

But this: &quot;What is almost universally assumed in these discussions is that stay-at-home dads are new&quot;

Do you have any empirical evidence that this is true? I have never seen anyone claim that involved dads are a totally new phenomenon. In fact, I have always assumed that over the course of history and throughout different cultures male and female roles in childrearing have consistently fluctuated and changed. I guess there&#039;s the gut feeling that the true pleasure I take in caring for my children is not such an anomaly and that other men throughout history have felt the same way. I think journalists talking about it with the silly SAHD terminology might lead to the idea that this is a new thing, when the true trend these days isn&#039;t just SAH-fatherhood, but fathers who are much more involved than their fathers were regardless of whether they are &quot;staying at home.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>But this: &#8220;What is almost universally assumed in these discussions is that stay-at-home dads are new&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have any empirical evidence that this is true? I have never seen anyone claim that involved dads are a totally new phenomenon. In fact, I have always assumed that over the course of history and throughout different cultures male and female roles in childrearing have consistently fluctuated and changed. I guess there&#8217;s the gut feeling that the true pleasure I take in caring for my children is not such an anomaly and that other men throughout history have felt the same way. I think journalists talking about it with the silly SAHD terminology might lead to the idea that this is a new thing, when the true trend these days isn&#8217;t just SAH-fatherhood, but fathers who are much more involved than their fathers were regardless of whether they are &#8220;staying at home.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m on the OUP blog! &#124; katherine pickering antonova</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2013/01/stay-at-home-dad-imperial-russia/#comment-338237</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m on the OUP blog! &#124; katherine pickering antonova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=33408#comment-338237</guid>
		<description>[...] out my guest post today on the Oxford University Press blog, about a mid-nineteenth-century Russian stay-at-home-dad.      Random, Research, Russiabook   &#8592; Book!     Leave a comment ?0 Comments.  /*  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out my guest post today on the Oxford University Press blog, about a mid-nineteenth-century Russian stay-at-home-dad.      Random, Research, Russiabook   &larr; Book!     Leave a comment ?0 Comments.  /*  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->