Comments on: Contraception, HSAs and the unnecessary controversy about religious conscience http://blog.oup.com/2012/12/contraception-hsa-controversy-religion-healthcare/ Academic insights for the thinking world. Fri, 24 May 2013 00:55:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Michael Lamb http://blog.oup.com/2012/12/contraception-hsa-controversy-religion-healthcare/#comment-334265 Michael Lamb Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:33:55 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/?p=32153#comment-334265 Thank you Alice, if it was you, but we might as well finish the job, and there is still another sentence to defuse: — But HSAs can also diffuse religious and ethical controversy by shifting contentious choices from employers to employees. I did mention a '"couple" of "nonsensical spellings of 'defuse'". I appreciate your linkifying the correction. Thank you Alice, if it was you, but we might as well finish the job, and there is still another sentence to defuse:

— But HSAs can also diffuse religious and ethical controversy by shifting contentious choices from employers to employees.

I did mention a ‘”couple” of “nonsensical spellings of ‘defuse’”.

I appreciate your linkifying the correction.

]]> By: Michael Lamb http://blog.oup.com/2012/12/contraception-hsa-controversy-religion-healthcare/#comment-333805 Michael Lamb Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:36:51 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/?p=32153#comment-333805 This was one garble I did think I could leave it to someone else to deal with, but one month later no one appears to have been sufficiently dismayed by the apparent advocacy of the diffusion of controversies and disputes to attempt to defuse a couple more unOxonian lapses. So is there any hope that I won't find myself defused again by your filter? Of an earlier post of mine you said that your spam filter is rather strong and you thought my original comment was buried among those awaiting the double-check. On that occasion it never appeared, so if that has happened again,do you mind if I ask you to give it your personal attention? The nonsensical spellings of 'defuse' really cannot be allowed to stand. This was one garble I did think I could leave it to someone else to deal with, but one month later no one appears to have been sufficiently dismayed by the apparent advocacy of the diffusion of controversies and disputes to attempt to defuse a couple more unOxonian lapses. So is there any hope that I won’t find myself defused again by your filter?

Of an earlier post of mine you said that your spam filter is rather strong and you thought my original comment was buried among those awaiting the double-check. On that occasion it never appeared, so if that has happened again,do you mind if I ask you to give it your personal attention? The nonsensical spellings of ‘defuse’ really cannot be allowed to stand.

]]>