<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democracy as concentration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2012/06/democracy-as-concentration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/06/democracy-as-concentration/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defending democratic politics &#124; Pragmatic Euphony</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/06/democracy-as-concentration/#comment-289175</link>
		<dc:creator>Defending democratic politics &#124; Pragmatic Euphony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=26144#comment-289175</guid>
		<description>[...] Democracy is therefore not a distraction because it ensures that public pressure actually matters. Elections matter because they allow arguments to be made and pressures to be vented. Elections inevitably produce ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ but at least the losers live to fight another day. If there is, however, a problem within American democracy it rests on the fact that some sections of society have arguably become what I call ‘democratically decadent’. Decadent in the sense that they seem to have forgotten that membership of any democratic society involves both rights and responsibilities; it involves listening and talking; giving and taking. No political system or politician can satisfy a world of ever greater public expectations.[Link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democracy is therefore not a distraction because it ensures that public pressure actually matters. Elections matter because they allow arguments to be made and pressures to be vented. Elections inevitably produce ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ but at least the losers live to fight another day. If there is, however, a problem within American democracy it rests on the fact that some sections of society have arguably become what I call ‘democratically decadent’. Decadent in the sense that they seem to have forgotten that membership of any democratic society involves both rights and responsibilities; it involves listening and talking; giving and taking. No political system or politician can satisfy a world of ever greater public expectations.[Link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Links &#8212; 6.27.12 &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/06/democracy-as-concentration/#comment-280502</link>
		<dc:creator>First Links &#8212; 6.27.12 &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=26144#comment-280502</guid>
		<description>[...]  First Links &#8212; 6.27.12 Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 9:00 AM Matthew Cantirino     Democracy as Concentration Matthew Flinders, Oxford University Press [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  First Links &#8212; 6.27.12 Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 9:00 AM Matthew Cantirino     Democracy as Concentration Matthew Flinders, Oxford University Press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->