<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential Pigmies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2012/02/presidential-pigmies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/02/presidential-pigmies/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Humphries</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/02/presidential-pigmies/#comment-252308</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=21116#comment-252308</guid>
		<description>I must concur with Mr. Postema. I do not care for the Republican candidates either, but the opening paragraph seems like a series of cheap shots and mars an otherwise well-written piece.

I am a Welshman now living in the USA, and while I admire the brilliance and resilience of the US constitution and the republic&#039;s development into a mature democracy in the last 200 years, I see weaknesses in a system many born-and-bred Americans believe it is sacrilege to question.  Naturally I am perturbed by the periodic resurgence of reactionary impulses. (And no, I do not think the British polity is superior.) Mr. Prochaska&#039;s book looks interesting indeed, but must obviously be read with his biases in mind.

Of course, guessing what the Founding Fathers would have thought of anything is a mug&#039;s game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must concur with Mr. Postema. I do not care for the Republican candidates either, but the opening paragraph seems like a series of cheap shots and mars an otherwise well-written piece.</p>
<p>I am a Welshman now living in the USA, and while I admire the brilliance and resilience of the US constitution and the republic&#8217;s development into a mature democracy in the last 200 years, I see weaknesses in a system many born-and-bred Americans believe it is sacrilege to question.  Naturally I am perturbed by the periodic resurgence of reactionary impulses. (And no, I do not think the British polity is superior.) Mr. Prochaska&#8217;s book looks interesting indeed, but must obviously be read with his biases in mind.</p>
<p>Of course, guessing what the Founding Fathers would have thought of anything is a mug&#8217;s game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Postema (@JoshPostema)</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2012/02/presidential-pigmies/#comment-251614</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Postema (@JoshPostema)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=21116#comment-251614</guid>
		<description>I stopped reading after this &quot;. Romney would say that the Founders admired Mormons and millionaires and didn’t care about the poor; &quot;.

I am not a Romney supporter by any means, but this is not what he said. I heard the whole context of this discussion and he mentioned that the poor have a safety net, which is why he wouldn&#039;t concern himself - he even added that the safety net would just need to be adjusted. 

Poor wording perhaps, but you twisted it in this article. That&#039;s a shame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped reading after this &#8220;. Romney would say that the Founders admired Mormons and millionaires and didn’t care about the poor; &#8220;.</p>
<p>I am not a Romney supporter by any means, but this is not what he said. I heard the whole context of this discussion and he mentioned that the poor have a safety net, which is why he wouldn&#8217;t concern himself &#8211; he even added that the safety net would just need to be adjusted. </p>
<p>Poor wording perhaps, but you twisted it in this article. That&#8217;s a shame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->