<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ship and the rings it leaves in etymological waters (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2011/09/ship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2011/09/ship/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OUPblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ship and the rings it leaves in etymological waters (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2011/09/ship/#comment-230065</link>
		<dc:creator>OUPblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ship and the rings it leaves in etymological waters (Part 2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=18248#comment-230065</guid>
		<description>[...] comments on the previous post (the ethnogenesis of the “Germans” and the native origin of the word ship, as opposed to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comments on the previous post (the ethnogenesis of the “Germans” and the native origin of the word ship, as opposed to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2011/09/ship/#comment-229032</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=18248#comment-229032</guid>
		<description>There are two good pieces of evidence that the Germanic-speakers came from southeastern Europe: one very old, the other very new.  The oldest bit of Old Norse we have (a poem preserved in the saga &quot;King Heidrek the Wise&quot;) tells us that Heidrek was killed under Harvath-fells, this being the result of applying the first Germanic sound-shift to &quot;Karpathes&quot;, the Carpathians.  And the phylogenetic comparative work of Don Ringe&#039;s group at the University of Pennsylvania (which, unlike other such efforts, begins with and depends on the conclusions of the comparative method) shows that Germanic began as a satem language and remains so in its morphology, but moved west and underwent partial lexical replacement from Proto-Italic (though probably not in Italy) before the final changes typical of the satem group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two good pieces of evidence that the Germanic-speakers came from southeastern Europe: one very old, the other very new.  The oldest bit of Old Norse we have (a poem preserved in the saga &#8220;King Heidrek the Wise&#8221;) tells us that Heidrek was killed under Harvath-fells, this being the result of applying the first Germanic sound-shift to &#8220;Karpathes&#8221;, the Carpathians.  And the phylogenetic comparative work of Don Ringe&#8217;s group at the University of Pennsylvania (which, unlike other such efforts, begins with and depends on the conclusions of the comparative method) shows that Germanic began as a satem language and remains so in its morphology, but moved west and underwent partial lexical replacement from Proto-Italic (though probably not in Italy) before the final changes typical of the satem group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Schuhmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2011/09/ship/#comment-229019</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Schuhmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=18248#comment-229019</guid>
		<description>There is no problem connecting the word for &#039;ship&#039; to the root pie. *skeh2i-b- (cp. latv. šķibīt &#039;to cut&#039;, an extension with *-b- to pie. *skeh2i- &#039;to cut, to divide&#039;), so pgerm. *skipa- &lt; pie. *skh2i-b-o- (for the root cp. Rasmussen, Morphophonematik, p. 61f. [different, but with a bad *-kh-, LIV]). So the ablaut and the semantic side are quite unproblematic. This etymology is even in the new dutch etymological dictionary (http://www.etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/schip), which normally is very fond of substrate words.

For the word &#039;sail&#039; a Celtic origin is very probable as stated by Katrin Thier (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01273.x/pdf).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no problem connecting the word for &#8216;ship&#8217; to the root pie. *skeh2i-b- (cp. latv. šķibīt &#8216;to cut&#8217;, an extension with *-b- to pie. *skeh2i- &#8216;to cut, to divide&#8217;), so pgerm. *skipa- &lt; pie. *skh2i-b-o- (for the root cp. Rasmussen, Morphophonematik, p. 61f. [different, but with a bad *-kh-, LIV]). So the ablaut and the semantic side are quite unproblematic. This etymology is even in the new dutch etymological dictionary (<a href="http://www.etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/schip" rel="nofollow">http://www.etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/schip</a>), which normally is very fond of substrate words.</p>
<p>For the word &#039;sail&#039; a Celtic origin is very probable as stated by Katrin Thier (<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01273.x/pdf" rel="nofollow">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2011.01273.x/pdf</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->