<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Refudiate this, word snobs!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Refudiate this, word snobs!” &#171; As a Linguist&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-205767</link>
		<dc:creator>“Refudiate this, word snobs!” &#171; As a Linguist&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-205767</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/      &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/</a>      &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Ewell</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-199567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Ewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-199567</guid>
		<description>The press and liberals hate her, but America loves her!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The press and liberals hate her, but America loves her!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxford’s 2010 Word of the Year &#124; Fullerton Stories</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-189314</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxford’s 2010 Word of the Year &#124; Fullerton Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-189314</guid>
		<description>[...] refudiate verb used loosely to mean “reject”: she called on them to refudiate the proposal to build a mosque. [origin — blend of refute and repudiate] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refudiate verb used loosely to mean “reject”: she called on them to refudiate the proposal to build a mosque. [origin — blend of refute and repudiate] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OUPblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OUP USA 2010 Word of the Year: Refudiate</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-189091</link>
		<dc:creator>OUPblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OUP USA 2010 Word of the Year: Refudiate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-189091</guid>
		<description>[...] note: I love being right. I really, really love it. In July, I guessed that &#8220;refudiate&#8221; would be named Word of the Year, and TA-DAH! I was right. What Paul the Octopus was to the FIFA World Cup, I am to WOTY (may he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] note: I love being right. I really, really love it. In July, I guessed that &#8220;refudiate&#8221; would be named Word of the Year, and TA-DAH! I was right. What Paul the Octopus was to the FIFA World Cup, I am to WOTY (may he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizzy</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-167925</link>
		<dc:creator>lizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-167925</guid>
		<description>&quot;Celebrates ignorance&quot;? Oh, come on! But since the topic is on the table, do you mean like pronouncing a common military term, &quot;corpseman,&quot; twice? Everyone makes slips of the tongue when one is constantly in the public eye (ear?), and everyone KNOWS that. Some of these verbal mistakes just get more pub that do others. Good grief! Lighten up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Celebrates ignorance&#8221;? Oh, come on! But since the topic is on the table, do you mean like pronouncing a common military term, &#8220;corpseman,&#8221; twice? Everyone makes slips of the tongue when one is constantly in the public eye (ear?), and everyone KNOWS that. Some of these verbal mistakes just get more pub that do others. Good grief! Lighten up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Argosy</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-167732</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Argosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-167732</guid>
		<description>You never know what could happen...look at the cringeworthy corruption of nuclear. It even has the alternate pronunciation in NOAD, and though it mentions it&#039;s unacceptable, I hear it all the time coming from people who should know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never know what could happen&#8230;look at the cringeworthy corruption of nuclear. It even has the alternate pronunciation in NOAD, and though it mentions it&#8217;s unacceptable, I hear it all the time coming from people who should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-167386</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-167386</guid>
		<description>But you don&#039;t love language that celebrates ignorance, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you don&#8217;t love language that celebrates ignorance, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harold</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-167151</link>
		<dc:creator>harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-167151</guid>
		<description>Sir Winston Churchill would have instantly replied, refugnant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Winston Churchill would have instantly replied, refugnant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166943</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166943</guid>
		<description>Refudiate is the same type of word as ginormous, or humongous.  Just noticed that Word did not underline in red “humongous.”  I guess if Sarah Palin had used it and/or typed it—it would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refudiate is the same type of word as ginormous, or humongous.  Just noticed that Word did not underline in red “humongous.”  I guess if Sarah Palin had used it and/or typed it—it would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizzy</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166857</link>
		<dc:creator>lizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166857</guid>
		<description>Anyone remember “sniglets”? Those are defined as words that “aren’t in the dictionary, but should be.” Bad English? Not so sure. Sniglets are delightful, and the authors of such contributions should be appreciated for their intuition and creativity, whether intentional or not. Here are a few examples:

AQUALIBRIUM The point where the stream of drinking fountain water is at its perfect height, thus relieving the drinker from having to either suck the nozzle or squirt himself in the eye.
BACKSPACKLE Markings on the back of one’s shirt from riding a fenderless bicycle.
BACKSPUBBLE Dishwater that disappears down one drain of a double sink and comes up the other.

The word “snark” may be a sniglet, and I am hoping that &quot;word websites&quot; such as this will remain places of good will, free of political snarkiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone remember “sniglets”? Those are defined as words that “aren’t in the dictionary, but should be.” Bad English? Not so sure. Sniglets are delightful, and the authors of such contributions should be appreciated for their intuition and creativity, whether intentional or not. Here are a few examples:</p>
<p>AQUALIBRIUM The point where the stream of drinking fountain water is at its perfect height, thus relieving the drinker from having to either suck the nozzle or squirt himself in the eye.<br />
BACKSPACKLE Markings on the back of one’s shirt from riding a fenderless bicycle.<br />
BACKSPUBBLE Dishwater that disappears down one drain of a double sink and comes up the other.</p>
<p>The word “snark” may be a sniglet, and I am hoping that &#8220;word websites&#8221; such as this will remain places of good will, free of political snarkiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166853</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166853</guid>
		<description>One might point ou to Ms Lindberg, it was neither Paul nor Sam Revere that made the midnight ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might point ou to Ms Lindberg, it was neither Paul nor Sam Revere that made the midnight ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmund Singleton</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166837</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmund Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166837</guid>
		<description>I just love colorful words and bad English wherever and whenever one may find it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love colorful words and bad English wherever and whenever one may find it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libhomo</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166806</link>
		<dc:creator>libhomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166806</guid>
		<description>I would refudiate any dictionary that included that word.

($arah Palin always is good for a laugh or two.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would refudiate any dictionary that included that word.</p>
<p>($arah Palin always is good for a laugh or two.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refudiation</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166794</link>
		<dc:creator>Refudiation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166794</guid>
		<description>[...] aides noticed that she used the &#8220;word&#8221; &#8220;refudiate&#8221; in a highly public way again, the Tweet was removed and replaced with a new Tweet, of nearly equal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aides noticed that she used the &#8220;word&#8221; &#8220;refudiate&#8221; in a highly public way again, the Tweet was removed and replaced with a new Tweet, of nearly equal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention OUPblog » Blog Archive » “Refudiate this, word snobs!” -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/07/refudiate/#comment-166782</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention OUPblog » Blog Archive » “Refudiate this, word snobs!” -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=10195#comment-166782</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brendan W. McAdams, Alyssa Smith, Lauren, Matthew Reznicek, Lauren and others. Lauren said: Oxford finally weighs in on the &quot;refudiate&quot; debate http://ow.ly/2e9lQ #shakespalin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brendan W. McAdams, Alyssa Smith, Lauren, Matthew Reznicek, Lauren and others. Lauren said: Oxford finally weighs in on the &quot;refudiate&quot; debate <a href="http://ow.ly/2e9lQ" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/2e9lQ</a> #shakespalin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->