<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reckoning with the Ghost of Jim Williams: The Supreme Court and the Burdens of History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2010/03/jim-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/03/jim-williams/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh, the arcanity! McDonald v. Chicago is exercise in pointless posturing. &#171; The Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/03/jim-williams/#comment-156922</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh, the arcanity! McDonald v. Chicago is exercise in pointless posturing. &#171; The Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7687#comment-156922</guid>
		<description>[...] Reckoning with the Ghost of Jim Williams: The Supreme Court and the Burdens of History (oup.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reckoning with the Ghost of Jim Williams: The Supreme Court and the Burdens of History (oup.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOSEPH M. NERI</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/03/jim-williams/#comment-156891</link>
		<dc:creator>JOSEPH M. NERI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7687#comment-156891</guid>
		<description>Good luck on getting &quot;the originalists&quot;, Scalia and Thomas to agree with you because they are only &quot;originalists&quot; when it suits their conservative philosophy.  Otherwise, they are just as much revisionists as the Republicans claimed the Warren Court to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck on getting &#8220;the originalists&#8221;, Scalia and Thomas to agree with you because they are only &#8220;originalists&#8221; when it suits their conservative philosophy.  Otherwise, they are just as much revisionists as the Republicans claimed the Warren Court to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->