<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:35:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Call for Federal Sales Tax Regulations &#124; Avalara Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-186304</link>
		<dc:creator>A Call for Federal Sales Tax Regulations &#124; Avalara Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-186304</guid>
		<description>[...] friends at the Oxford University Press argue that states hands are tied in collecting e commerce sales tax. Most webstores do not establish nexus in all states they operate and therefore their online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friends at the Oxford University Press argue that states hands are tied in collecting e commerce sales tax. Most webstores do not establish nexus in all states they operate and therefore their online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALC</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-157024</link>
		<dc:creator>ALC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-157024</guid>
		<description>Great idea! Lets make everyone enforce the most regressive tax. If the states want money have them raise their income taxes. That way we will really know what they cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! Lets make everyone enforce the most regressive tax. If the states want money have them raise their income taxes. That way we will really know what they cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austrian Mind</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156170</link>
		<dc:creator>Austrian Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156170</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, poor poor government not getting its blood money. Everyday people are able to quickly and convieniently browse the entire world for the best product and at reduced cost--What a tragedy! Oh cruel misfortune! How dare free people enjoy such free and bountiful commerce!

Notice how you did not once consider how tax-free and low overhead of internet business is a massive boom to citizens and merchants alike. Instead, you bemoan the injustice that wealth cannot be syphoned away to feed bloated goverment welfare and warfare. 
You are a a statist shill, Mr. Zelinsky. May your collar never chafe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, poor poor government not getting its blood money. Everyday people are able to quickly and convieniently browse the entire world for the best product and at reduced cost&#8211;What a tragedy! Oh cruel misfortune! How dare free people enjoy such free and bountiful commerce!</p>
<p>Notice how you did not once consider how tax-free and low overhead of internet business is a massive boom to citizens and merchants alike. Instead, you bemoan the injustice that wealth cannot be syphoned away to feed bloated goverment welfare and warfare.<br />
You are a a statist shill, Mr. Zelinsky. May your collar never chafe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156157</guid>
		<description>I agree that the internet should be taxed fairly, but what about very small business that sell online? For example I sell books through Amazon, they go all over the country, how would I calculate sales tax for each state? Would I be sending $3.48 to California, $10.22 to New York and so on? It would be a nightmare!! What if the internet was taxed at one low rate and then the money was divided fairly among the states? This would simplify things, but still generate revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the internet should be taxed fairly, but what about very small business that sell online? For example I sell books through Amazon, they go all over the country, how would I calculate sales tax for each state? Would I be sending $3.48 to California, $10.22 to New York and so on? It would be a nightmare!! What if the internet was taxed at one low rate and then the money was divided fairly among the states? This would simplify things, but still generate revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Beck Tele Seminar</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156143</link>
		<dc:creator>John Beck Tele Seminar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156143</guid>
		<description>Many consumers are finding online shopping quite convenient and easy. More than anything else its the ease with which we can compare features and prices and can make best buying decision on the internet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many consumers are finding online shopping quite convenient and easy. More than anything else its the ease with which we can compare features and prices and can make best buying decision on the internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLP</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156120</link>
		<dc:creator>KLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156120</guid>
		<description>...or, states could just repeal their sales taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or, states could just repeal their sales taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. David L. Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156091</link>
		<dc:creator>R. David L. Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156091</guid>
		<description>Our &quot;simpleton&quot; argument that local sales taxes should be collected by ALL merchants is based upon our knowledge and ability to completely address &quot;the logistical nightmare&quot; which has accompanied this issue in the past.

Our TaxCloud sales tax-as-a-service, which will be available later this year, will be offered at no charge to merchants, to facilitate collection and compliance.

Our TaxCloud service (currently undergoing state-by-state certification under the SSUTA) automatically calculates and remits state, regional, local, and special jurisdictional taxes (again at zero cost to merchants). Also per the SSUTA, TaxCloud automatically manages exemptions (entity-based, item-based, and calendar-based), and also prepares Simplified Electronic Returns to each taxing jurisdiction.  We are working toward implementing TaxCloud for all SSUTA and non-SSUTA states alike (except, of course, the states that do not collect sales tax).
 
We are building TaxCloud because we firmly believe that our local communities deserve the funds which were anticipated when voters approved their respective local initiatives for public services and projects.  We also know that a well designed and implemented web service could be easily integrated with existing online &quot;shopping cart&quot; software and point-of-sale systems.

You can see a preliminary demonstration of TaxCloud calculating tax rates for thousands of state and local tax jurisdictions at http://myrate.taxcloud.net . As states, counties or transportation districts update their rates, TaxCloud and all TaxCloud merchants get the change automatically, and maintain compliance with all local sales tax laws.

It is time to tell ALL Internet merchants (not just Amazon.com) to start collecting and remitting local sales tax, just like the corner store has to. Stop pretending that the transaction is “tax-free” because Use tax is still due.

Your local sales tax should be collected &amp; remitted for you by all merchants, so businesses and individuals don’t have to meticulously keep track of all out-of-state transactions.

R. David L. Campbell
Chief Executive
The Federal Tax Authority ( http://Fed-Tax.net )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our &#8220;simpleton&#8221; argument that local sales taxes should be collected by ALL merchants is based upon our knowledge and ability to completely address &#8220;the logistical nightmare&#8221; which has accompanied this issue in the past.</p>
<p>Our TaxCloud sales tax-as-a-service, which will be available later this year, will be offered at no charge to merchants, to facilitate collection and compliance.</p>
<p>Our TaxCloud service (currently undergoing state-by-state certification under the SSUTA) automatically calculates and remits state, regional, local, and special jurisdictional taxes (again at zero cost to merchants). Also per the SSUTA, TaxCloud automatically manages exemptions (entity-based, item-based, and calendar-based), and also prepares Simplified Electronic Returns to each taxing jurisdiction.  We are working toward implementing TaxCloud for all SSUTA and non-SSUTA states alike (except, of course, the states that do not collect sales tax).</p>
<p>We are building TaxCloud because we firmly believe that our local communities deserve the funds which were anticipated when voters approved their respective local initiatives for public services and projects.  We also know that a well designed and implemented web service could be easily integrated with existing online &#8220;shopping cart&#8221; software and point-of-sale systems.</p>
<p>You can see a preliminary demonstration of TaxCloud calculating tax rates for thousands of state and local tax jurisdictions at <a href="http://myrate.taxcloud.net" rel="nofollow">http://myrate.taxcloud.net</a> . As states, counties or transportation districts update their rates, TaxCloud and all TaxCloud merchants get the change automatically, and maintain compliance with all local sales tax laws.</p>
<p>It is time to tell ALL Internet merchants (not just Amazon.com) to start collecting and remitting local sales tax, just like the corner store has to. Stop pretending that the transaction is “tax-free” because Use tax is still due.</p>
<p>Your local sales tax should be collected &amp; remitted for you by all merchants, so businesses and individuals don’t have to meticulously keep track of all out-of-state transactions.</p>
<p>R. David L. Campbell<br />
Chief Executive<br />
The Federal Tax Authority ( <a href="http://Fed-Tax.net" rel="nofollow">http://Fed-Tax.net</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156084</link>
		<dc:creator>DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156084</guid>
		<description>This is a typical, yet simpleton, argument for an online sales tax, which shows no regard whatsoever for the logistical nightmare that is inherent with any of the proposed tax ideas that have been discussed at the state and federal level.

Look, simply saying &quot;it&#039;s not fair&quot; doesn&#039;t make this an open and shut case.  Consumers have benefitted from the absence of an online sales tax but is that REALLY so horrible given the dire straits many are in over the past few years due to bad economic policy and decision-making by govermnment leaders?  

Fact: every idea to date that has sought to add an internet sales tax has been more trouble than it is worth.  In New York, their solution was to force retailers themselves to find a way to collect the sales tax from online transactions, and the burden and cost of collection itself was to be put on those retailers as well.  Basically, the lawmakers in Albany want your tax revenue, they just don&#039;t want to do anything themselves to collect it.  How is that a sensible solution?

An online sales tax may or may not be a good idea but implementing one simply for the sake of fairness, without really delving into the cause and effect, is stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a typical, yet simpleton, argument for an online sales tax, which shows no regard whatsoever for the logistical nightmare that is inherent with any of the proposed tax ideas that have been discussed at the state and federal level.</p>
<p>Look, simply saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not fair&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make this an open and shut case.  Consumers have benefitted from the absence of an online sales tax but is that REALLY so horrible given the dire straits many are in over the past few years due to bad economic policy and decision-making by govermnment leaders?  </p>
<p>Fact: every idea to date that has sought to add an internet sales tax has been more trouble than it is worth.  In New York, their solution was to force retailers themselves to find a way to collect the sales tax from online transactions, and the burden and cost of collection itself was to be put on those retailers as well.  Basically, the lawmakers in Albany want your tax revenue, they just don&#8217;t want to do anything themselves to collect it.  How is that a sensible solution?</p>
<p>An online sales tax may or may not be a good idea but implementing one simply for the sake of fairness, without really delving into the cause and effect, is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Shopping</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156083</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156083</guid>
		<description>Many consumers are finding online shopping quite convenient and easy. More than anything else its the ease with which we can compare features and prices and can make best buying decision on the internet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many consumers are finding online shopping quite convenient and easy. More than anything else its the ease with which we can compare features and prices and can make best buying decision on the internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156069</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156069</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: Edward Zelinsky thinks that next year we should tax Internet sales:http://bit.ly/4EzRG1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: Edward Zelinsky thinks that next year we should tax Internet sales:<a href="http://bit.ly/4EzRG1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4EzRG1</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156068</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156068</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matthew Lloyd, phyllis nash. phyllis nash said: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales http://bit.ly/6b7oLA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matthew Lloyd, phyllis nash. phyllis nash said: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales <a href="http://bit.ly/6b7oLA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6b7oLA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; &#171; BBSTOR</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156067</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; &#171; BBSTOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156067</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230;   Bookmark It                                               Hide Sites    $$(&#039;div.d3698&#039;).each( [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230;   Bookmark It                                               Hide Sites    $$(&#39;div.d3698&#39;).each( [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; &#171; Internet Cafe Solution</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156066</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; &#171; Internet Cafe Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156066</guid>
		<description>[...] See more here: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more here: The Lesson of the 2009 Holiday Shopping Season: Tax Internet Sales &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. David L. Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156064</link>
		<dc:creator>R. David L. Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156064</guid>
		<description>Wow - it would seem that with this blog system ANY character next to a URL is automatically included in the URL.  The correct URL for our company is http://fed-tax.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; it would seem that with this blog system ANY character next to a URL is automatically included in the URL.  The correct URL for our company is <a href="http://fed-tax.net" rel="nofollow">http://fed-tax.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. David L. Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156063</link>
		<dc:creator>R. David L. Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156063</guid>
		<description>Mis-typed the URL to our blog post related to &quot;Affiliate Taxes.&quot;  Please use this one ( http://wp.me/pvXY8-1b ).

R. David L. Campbell
Chief Executive
The Federal Tax Authority (http://Fed-Tax.net)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mis-typed the URL to our blog post related to &#8220;Affiliate Taxes.&#8221;  Please use this one ( <a href="http://wp.me/pvXY8-1b" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pvXY8-1b</a> ).</p>
<p>R. David L. Campbell<br />
Chief Executive<br />
The Federal Tax Authority (<a href="http://Fed-Tax.net" rel="nofollow">http://Fed-Tax.net</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Response: Oxford University Press Blog Post &#171; blog.Fed-Tax.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156062</link>
		<dc:creator>Response: Oxford University Press Blog Post &#171; blog.Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156062</guid>
		<description>[...] Oxford University Press Blog&#160;Post  Edward Zelinsky posted a well-written and concise article on the Oxford University Press Blog today detailing why Congress should adopt federal legislation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oxford University Press Blog&nbsp;Post  Edward Zelinsky posted a well-written and concise article on the Oxford University Press Blog today detailing why Congress should adopt federal legislation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. David L. Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2010/01/tax-internet-sales/#comment-156061</link>
		<dc:creator>R. David L. Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=7091#comment-156061</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Hopefully the revised Main Street Fairness Act will be soon introduced before congress to address this very issue.

We agree completely that the so-called &quot;Affiliate Taxes&quot; are an unequal and innapropriate mechanism for taxation (which we have detailed on our blog at http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/). A significant concern surrounding such legislation is that it could be interpreted to include any direct response mechanism (or for that matter, any contractual relationship) as it blurs the historical &quot;bright-line&quot; test of physical presence to determine substantial nexus.

The Main Street Fairness Act will finally mature efforts which has been underway for the last ten years called the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (or SSUTA). SSUTA has been developed collectively by 44 states, along with industry groups and retailers, in an effort to simplify and modernize state-by-state sales tax codes to eliminate the overly burdensome &quot;entanglements&quot; cited by the US Supreme Court opinions from 1967 (Bellas Hess) and again in 1992 (Quill).  Complete details about SSUTA are available at their website, http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org.

We maintain that with basic application of modern technology with SSUTA simplified rules and procedures, systems within e-commerce websites could easily calculate (and collect, and remit) accurate local destination-based sales tax, using techniques akin to real-time shipping calculation - a feature frequently a part of most modern web purchasing experiences today.

Thank you again for your thoughtfully considered post, and we look forward to the day when ALL merchants are collecting and remitting local sales tax.

R. David L. Campbell
Chief Executive
The Federal Tax Authority (Fed-Tax.net)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Hopefully the revised Main Street Fairness Act will be soon introduced before congress to address this very issue.</p>
<p>We agree completely that the so-called &#8220;Affiliate Taxes&#8221; are an unequal and innapropriate mechanism for taxation (which we have detailed on our blog at <a href="http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/</a>). A significant concern surrounding such legislation is that it could be interpreted to include any direct response mechanism (or for that matter, any contractual relationship) as it blurs the historical &#8220;bright-line&#8221; test of physical presence to determine substantial nexus.</p>
<p>The Main Street Fairness Act will finally mature efforts which has been underway for the last ten years called the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (or SSUTA). SSUTA has been developed collectively by 44 states, along with industry groups and retailers, in an effort to simplify and modernize state-by-state sales tax codes to eliminate the overly burdensome &#8220;entanglements&#8221; cited by the US Supreme Court opinions from 1967 (Bellas Hess) and again in 1992 (Quill).  Complete details about SSUTA are available at their website, <a href="http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org</a>.</p>
<p>We maintain that with basic application of modern technology with SSUTA simplified rules and procedures, systems within e-commerce websites could easily calculate (and collect, and remit) accurate local destination-based sales tax, using techniques akin to real-time shipping calculation &#8211; a feature frequently a part of most modern web purchasing experiences today.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your thoughtfully considered post, and we look forward to the day when ALL merchants are collecting and remitting local sales tax.</p>
<p>R. David L. Campbell<br />
Chief Executive<br />
The Federal Tax Authority (Fed-Tax.net)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->