<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Student speed dating</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-156036</link>
		<dc:creator>Student speed dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-156036</guid>
		<description>speed dating may not be a sound strategy for finding love.Guess this theory can definitely optimize the time and money.The principles and design process methods are really amazing.Hope every one can enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speed dating may not be a sound strategy for finding love.Guess this theory can definitely optimize the time and money.The principles and design process methods are really amazing.Hope every one can enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-155965</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-155965</guid>
		<description>Speed dating as patent eligible... that&#039;s pretty interesting. Wonder what they will decide?

If you are interested, you can check out more dating events, including speed dating at http://www.mydatingadvicefree.com/dating-events/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed dating as patent eligible&#8230; that&#8217;s pretty interesting. Wonder what they will decide?</p>
<p>If you are interested, you can check out more dating events, including speed dating at <a href="http://www.mydatingadvicefree.com/dating-events/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mydatingadvicefree.com/dating-events/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes Justice Scalia, There Were Patents Relating To Training Horses in the 1890s; But More Importantly, We Need Them Today : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154896</link>
		<dc:creator>Yes Justice Scalia, There Were Patents Relating To Training Horses in the 1890s; But More Importantly, We Need Them Today : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154896</guid>
		<description>[...] Speed Dating is not the only issue that our nine Justices of the Supreme Court raised on November 9, 2009 to determine what types of processes should be entitled to “patent worthiness.” Justice Scalia wanted to know why, if the patent laws were intended to cover broad processes, weren’t there any patents filed in the 1800s relating to training horses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speed Dating is not the only issue that our nine Justices of the Supreme Court raised on November 9, 2009 to determine what types of processes should be entitled to “patent worthiness.” Justice Scalia wanted to know why, if the patent laws were intended to cover broad processes, weren’t there any patents filed in the 1800s relating to training horses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154377</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154377</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent &#8230; &#124; InOnlineDating.Com: Online Dating Made Easy</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154375</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent &#8230; &#124; InOnlineDating.Com: Online Dating Made Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154375</guid>
		<description>[...] See more here:  Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more here:  Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: step back</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154356</link>
		<dc:creator>step back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154356</guid>
		<description>&quot;Speed dating&quot; is indeed an interesting question to have been posed by our new Wise Latina member of the Court.

Let&#039;s say you are a 34 year old single female in desperate hunt for a life mate because your biological clock is running out.

Let&#039;s say that mathematicians Bilski and Ward had decided to focus their skills on devising a method for reducing risk of being matched to a Frog instead of a potential Prince Charming rather than to energy commodities.

Let&#039;s say their Bilski Claim 1 read as follows:

An improved speed dating process comprising:

(a) for each mate-seeking female, determining which counterpart potential suitor is more likely to be a frog for that female and which is more likely to be her Prince Charming;

(b) ranking the determinations; and

(c) initiating sequential speed dating interactions between the females and their counterpart potential suitors according to said rankings with most likely suitors being positioned at the front of the sequence.

Now; will such a method &quot;transform&quot; the life of a 34 year old mate-seeking female? Will it be &quot;useful&quot; to her. Will it have concrete, tangible and possibly lifelong consequences?

And will the Wise Latina conclude that such innovation should or should not be encouraged by yes/no making it &quot;patent eligible&quot; subject matter? Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Speed dating&#8221; is indeed an interesting question to have been posed by our new Wise Latina member of the Court.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you are a 34 year old single female in desperate hunt for a life mate because your biological clock is running out.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that mathematicians Bilski and Ward had decided to focus their skills on devising a method for reducing risk of being matched to a Frog instead of a potential Prince Charming rather than to energy commodities.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say their Bilski Claim 1 read as follows:</p>
<p>An improved speed dating process comprising:</p>
<p>(a) for each mate-seeking female, determining which counterpart potential suitor is more likely to be a frog for that female and which is more likely to be her Prince Charming;</p>
<p>(b) ranking the determinations; and</p>
<p>(c) initiating sequential speed dating interactions between the females and their counterpart potential suitors according to said rankings with most likely suitors being positioned at the front of the sequence.</p>
<p>Now; will such a method &#8220;transform&#8221; the life of a 34 year old mate-seeking female? Will it be &#8220;useful&#8221; to her. Will it have concrete, tangible and possibly lifelong consequences?</p>
<p>And will the Wise Latina conclude that such innovation should or should not be encouraged by yes/no making it &#8220;patent eligible&#8221; subject matter? Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154354</guid>
		<description>Actually here is the patent for online speed dating:

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7203674/fulltext.html 

The company bringing a product to market based on this patent is SpeedDate.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually here is the patent for online speed dating:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7203674/fulltext.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7203674/fulltext.html</a> </p>
<p>The company bringing a product to market based on this patent is SpeedDate.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154352</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: Justice Sotomayor, perhaps &quot;speed dating&quot; should be patent-eligible after all: http://bit.ly/1YlN0V...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: Justice Sotomayor, perhaps &#8220;speed dating&#8221; should be patent-eligible after all: <a href="http://bit.ly/1YlN0V.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1YlN0V..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154351</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by natasha83, datingexpert. datingexpert said: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All: OUPblog (blog) “Speed dating” (t.. http://bit.ly/3je6lk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by natasha83, datingexpert. datingexpert said: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All: OUPblog (blog) “Speed dating” (t.. <a href="http://bit.ly/3je6lk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3je6lk</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/11/speed-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-154350</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=6418#comment-154350</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rebecca and Stan Morse, Erin Conway. Erin Conway said: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All: OUPblog (blog) In the article be.. http://bit.ly/4iFeHO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rebecca and Stan Morse, Erin Conway. Erin Conway said: Justice Sotomayor, Perhaps “Speed Dating” Should Be Patent-Eligible After All: OUPblog (blog) In the article be.. <a href="http://bit.ly/4iFeHO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4iFeHO</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
