<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Oddest and Dumbest English Spellings, Part 15, With a Note on Words and Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dictation redux &#124; Autonoblogger</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-156396</link>
		<dc:creator>Dictation redux &#124; Autonoblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-156396</guid>
		<description>[...] The Oddest and Dumbest English Spellings, Part 15, With a Note on Words and Things (oup.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Oddest and Dumbest English Spellings, Part 15, With a Note on Words and Things (oup.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-155286</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-155286</guid>
		<description>Of all the various misspellings of my name, the one I&#039;ve come to most detest is &quot;Malcomb&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the various misspellings of my name, the one I&#8217;ve come to most detest is &#8220;Malcomb&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: val Yule</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154145</link>
		<dc:creator>val Yule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154145</guid>
		<description>Etymology is shown to be no guide to English spelling, and often misleads. Unnecessarily difficult words should be systematised so that people did not have the problems with English spelling that are notorious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Etymology is shown to be no guide to English spelling, and often misleads. Unnecessarily difficult words should be systematised so that people did not have the problems with English spelling that are notorious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Longnecker</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154130</link>
		<dc:creator>John Longnecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154130</guid>
		<description>Why do improbable phrases become so popular?  I think of &quot;turned up missing&quot; or, one that appears almost daily in the news &quot;went missing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do improbable phrases become so popular?  I think of &#8220;turned up missing&#8221; or, one that appears almost daily in the news &#8220;went missing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Comaish</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154032</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Comaish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154032</guid>
		<description>&#039;Thumb,&#039; like &#039;dumb,&#039; needs an additional consonant to facilitate verbal declension, when you think about it (and double &#039;m&#039; might look *dumb.* Having said that, it just occurred to me that American usage needs two homophonous spellings of &#039;dumb&#039; to distinguish meanings and avoid offense). 
There is no certain evidence of how Middle Englanders pronounced &#039;solemn&#039; or anything else, and there undoubtedly have been forces at work in English spelling intent on inserting silent letters, either for purposes of line spacing or rococo effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Thumb,&#8217; like &#8216;dumb,&#8217; needs an additional consonant to facilitate verbal declension, when you think about it (and double &#8216;m&#8217; might look *dumb.* Having said that, it just occurred to me that American usage needs two homophonous spellings of &#8216;dumb&#8217; to distinguish meanings and avoid offense).<br />
There is no certain evidence of how Middle Englanders pronounced &#8217;solemn&#8217; or anything else, and there undoubtedly have been forces at work in English spelling intent on inserting silent letters, either for purposes of line spacing or rococo effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Comaish</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154031</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Comaish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154031</guid>
		<description>&#039;Good&#039; &amp; &#039;God&#039; not etymologically related? This is a counter-intuitive and ultimately undemonstrable statement of faith of the kind which leads to schisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Good&#8217; &amp; &#8216;God&#8217; not etymologically related? This is a counter-intuitive and ultimately undemonstrable statement of faith of the kind which leads to schisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciano</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154028</link>
		<dc:creator>Luciano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154028</guid>
		<description>A similar process happened from Latin to Spanish: homo, hominis - hombre, fames, famis - hambre, legumen, leguminis - legumbre, and a few others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar process happened from Latin to Spanish: homo, hominis &#8211; hombre, fames, famis &#8211; hambre, legumen, leguminis &#8211; legumbre, and a few others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Everingham</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154027</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Everingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154027</guid>
		<description>climb, clamber ? related to clamp, cramp, crimp, crimple, crumple and optional &#039;p&#039; sound in tempt, cramped etc., &#039;b&#039; sound in crumbed ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>climb, clamber ? related to clamp, cramp, crimp, crimple, crumple and optional &#8216;p&#8217; sound in tempt, cramped etc., &#8216;b&#8217; sound in crumbed ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Goranson</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-154005</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Goranson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-154005</guid>
		<description>Quite interesting.. Some of that lore:
http://www.romanticroad.com/fingerhutmuseum/
&quot;History of the Thimble...By The Fingerhut Museum&#039;s Founder&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting.. Some of that lore:<br />
<a href="http://www.romanticroad.com/fingerhutmuseum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.romanticroad.com/fingerhutmuseum/</a><br />
&#8220;History of the Thimble&#8230;By The Fingerhut Museum&#8217;s Founder&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-153970</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-153970</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: The dumbest English spellings: http://bit.ly/4w5my7...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by oupblog: The dumbest English spellings: <a href="http://bit.ly/4w5my7.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4w5my7..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Oddest and Dumbest English Spellings, Part 15, With a Note on Words and Things : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-153966</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Oddest and Dumbest English Spellings, Part 15, With a Note on Words and Things : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-153966</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kassia Krozser and Rebecca, Chris Davey. Chris Davey said: RT @oupblog: The dumbest English spellings: http://bit.ly/4w5my7 / (Is this really part 15 of a series?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kassia Krozser and Rebecca, Chris Davey. Chris Davey said: RT @oupblog: The dumbest English spellings: <a href="http://bit.ly/4w5my7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4w5my7</a> / (Is this really part 15 of a series?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/10/dumbest_english_spellings/comment-page-1/#comment-153965</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5963#comment-153965</guid>
		<description>Wonderful post, as always! But as someone who&#039;s sewn since childhood, I have one correction: A thimble is worn on the *middle* finger, not the index finger. So it should be all rights be called .... (I&#039;ll leave that to you!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful post, as always! But as someone who&#8217;s sewn since childhood, I have one correction: A thimble is worn on the *middle* finger, not the index finger. So it should be all rights be called &#8230;. (I&#8217;ll leave that to you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
