<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monthly Gleanings, Part Two: (August 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J P Maher</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/#comment-153512</link>
		<dc:creator>J P Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5444#comment-153512</guid>
		<description>More on ilk, milk, pillow etc.
Those who say MELK, PELLOW and ELLINOIS nonetheless write MILK, PILLOW, Illinois...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on ilk, milk, pillow etc.<br />
Those who say MELK, PELLOW and ELLINOIS nonetheless write MILK, PILLOW, Illinois&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J P Maher</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/#comment-153481</link>
		<dc:creator>J P Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5444#comment-153481</guid>
		<description>&quot;Those who say melk and pellow for milk and pillow never say ilk and fillow for elk and fellow.&quot; Non sequitur. 

And fillah is attested: 
Full text of &quot;When ghost meets ghost&quot;
I believe if I did it once when I was a young fillah I did it fifty times.&quot; &quot;Did what?&quot; &quot; Well — breathed free on hearing that a girl wasn&#039;t engaged.&quot;
www.archive.org/stream/.../whenghostmeetsgh00demo_djvu.txt

This may be eye-dialect for fellah, as feller can also be..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Those who say melk and pellow for milk and pillow never say ilk and fillow for elk and fellow.&#8221; Non sequitur. </p>
<p>And fillah is attested:<br />
Full text of &#8220;When ghost meets ghost&#8221;<br />
I believe if I did it once when I was a young fillah I did it fifty times.&#8221; &#8220;Did what?&#8221; &#8221; Well — breathed free on hearing that a girl wasn&#8217;t engaged.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/.../whenghostmeetsgh00demo_djvu.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/stream/&#8230;/whenghostmeetsgh00demo_djvu.txt</a></p>
<p>This may be eye-dialect for fellah, as feller can also be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/#comment-153448</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5444#comment-153448</guid>
		<description>Thank you for last week’s discussion of vixen and company. And for this week’s discussion.
But it’s not enough. I’m sure I’m not the only one of your readers who is patting his foot in anticipation of the other volumes of your dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for last week’s discussion of vixen and company. And for this week’s discussion.<br />
But it’s not enough. I’m sure I’m not the only one of your readers who is patting his foot in anticipation of the other volumes of your dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevo</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/#comment-153444</link>
		<dc:creator>stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5444#comment-153444</guid>
		<description>At the end of the paragraph &quot;Language Name&quot; it says &quot;Lojlan&quot;, but it should probably be &quot;Lojban&quot;, the name of the biggest and best known descendent of Loglan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the paragraph &#8220;Language Name&#8221; it says &#8220;Lojlan&#8221;, but it should probably be &#8220;Lojban&#8221;, the name of the biggest and best known descendent of Loglan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/09/monthly-gleanings-september/#comment-153435</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=5444#comment-153435</guid>
		<description>Yes, please tell us about &lt;i&gt;skedaddle&lt;/i&gt;!

I see no reason to doubt the story that the OED2 quotations tell us about &lt;i&gt;deadpan&lt;/i&gt;: that it began in the 1920s as a technical term in vaudeville based on a slang word but not itself slang, spread to literature by the 1930s, and was in routine use by the &lt;i&gt;TLS&lt;/i&gt; by 1949.  A quick ascent, but not an unprecedented one.

I still think &lt;i&gt;Sam Hill&lt;/i&gt; is taboo deformation, which need not follow the rules of ordinary sound change.  Consider &lt;i&gt;nerts&lt;/i&gt;, a taboo deformation for &lt;i&gt;nuts&lt;/i&gt;, clearly developed in a rhotic accent area. STRUT to NURSE is not as far as I know represented elsewhere in English: r&#039;s tend to get lost, not created ex nihilo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, please tell us about <i>skedaddle</i>!</p>
<p>I see no reason to doubt the story that the OED2 quotations tell us about <i>deadpan</i>: that it began in the 1920s as a technical term in vaudeville based on a slang word but not itself slang, spread to literature by the 1930s, and was in routine use by the <i>TLS</i> by 1949.  A quick ascent, but not an unprecedented one.</p>
<p>I still think <i>Sam Hill</i> is taboo deformation, which need not follow the rules of ordinary sound change.  Consider <i>nerts</i>, a taboo deformation for <i>nuts</i>, clearly developed in a rhotic accent area. STRUT to NURSE is not as far as I know represented elsewhere in English: r&#8217;s tend to get lost, not created ex nihilo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->