<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spring Training and Senatorial Appointments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2009/03/baseball_senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/03/baseball_senate/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RestoreFederalism</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2009/03/baseball_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-149805</link>
		<dc:creator>RestoreFederalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=3775#comment-149805</guid>
		<description>What really changed with the 17th was not just the method of selection (legislative appointment gave way to popular democracy), but who a senator represents.  The 17th did violence to the fundamental principle of &quot;separation of powers&quot; by abolishing the representation of one power (the sovereign state governments) and doubling the representation of another (the people).  The exponential growth in the cost and scope of the national government is a direct result of this imbalance.  After all, with &quot;the people&#039;s will&quot; so heavily represented, what is left that can provide a proper check?  The Framers valued democracy, but they understood that it had practical and philosophical limits that had to be countered by some other force (the state governments).  Without that, democracy crushes under its own weight, as we are seeing today.

http://www.restorefederalism.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really changed with the 17th was not just the method of selection (legislative appointment gave way to popular democracy), but who a senator represents.  The 17th did violence to the fundamental principle of &#8220;separation of powers&#8221; by abolishing the representation of one power (the sovereign state governments) and doubling the representation of another (the people).  The exponential growth in the cost and scope of the national government is a direct result of this imbalance.  After all, with &#8220;the people&#8217;s will&#8221; so heavily represented, what is left that can provide a proper check?  The Framers valued democracy, but they understood that it had practical and philosophical limits that had to be countered by some other force (the state governments).  Without that, democracy crushes under its own weight, as we are seeing today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.restorefederalism.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.restorefederalism.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
