<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uppity-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slang 101 : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/comment-page-1/#comment-147489</link>
		<dc:creator>Slang 101 : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=2113#comment-147489</guid>
		<description>[...] specializes in actions for personal injuries). This feature could particularly come in handy for politicians, “I’m sorry, I didn’t realize that term was offensive to [insert cultural or racial group [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specializes in actions for personal injuries). This feature could particularly come in handy for politicians, “I’m sorry, I didn’t realize that term was offensive to [insert cultural or racial group [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; is about Lynching &#171; zunguzungu</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/comment-page-1/#comment-147369</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; is about Lynching &#171; zunguzungu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=2113#comment-147369</guid>
		<description>[...] or England or Israel or France or Pakistan because, while they already have WMD&#8217;s, the &#8220;uppity&#8221; standard does not apply to them for that very reason. Having joined the concert of civilized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or England or Israel or France or Pakistan because, while they already have WMD&#8217;s, the &#8220;uppity&#8221; standard does not apply to them for that very reason. Having joined the concert of civilized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/comment-page-1/#comment-147354</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=2113#comment-147354</guid>
		<description>I must say as someone who lived in Georgia for my first 3 decades (the last 5 years in NYC)and as someone with a graduate degree from an elite Northeast university I never knew there was a racial undertone to &quot;uppity&quot; until I read this passage.  I had heard that Westmoreland offended some by calling Obama &quot;uppity.&quot; I thought this was upseting because it brought back the whole &quot;Obama is elitist&quot; nonsense.  

I don&#039;t know that I&#039;ve ever used the word &quot;uppity&quot; but my grandmother did quite frequently - always in reference to white people.  She used as a synonym of &quot;snobby&quot;.

I most assuredly am not out to defend Westmoreland and shutter at any commonalities with an ignorant man who fought hard for the 10 commandments to be displayed in a public building but couldn&#039;t name a single commandment during his appearance on the Colbert Report.

I guess I was ignorant on &quot;uppity.&quot;  I can&#039;t help but wonder how many people I&#039;ve offended by unknowingly using potentially offencvie words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say as someone who lived in Georgia for my first 3 decades (the last 5 years in NYC)and as someone with a graduate degree from an elite Northeast university I never knew there was a racial undertone to &#8220;uppity&#8221; until I read this passage.  I had heard that Westmoreland offended some by calling Obama &#8220;uppity.&#8221; I thought this was upseting because it brought back the whole &#8220;Obama is elitist&#8221; nonsense.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ve ever used the word &#8220;uppity&#8221; but my grandmother did quite frequently &#8211; always in reference to white people.  She used as a synonym of &#8220;snobby&#8221;.</p>
<p>I most assuredly am not out to defend Westmoreland and shutter at any commonalities with an ignorant man who fought hard for the 10 commandments to be displayed in a public building but couldn&#8217;t name a single commandment during his appearance on the Colbert Report.</p>
<p>I guess I was ignorant on &#8220;uppity.&#8221;  I can&#8217;t help but wonder how many people I&#8217;ve offended by unknowingly using potentially offencvie words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mollymooly</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/comment-page-1/#comment-147352</link>
		<dc:creator>mollymooly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=2113#comment-147352</guid>
		<description>Looking at the British SARA corpus, the racial connotations are not so prominent as in the U.S.; but the word seems often to be used in a double-layered way: the author describes someone else as viewing a third person as &quot;uppity&quot;; implying a criticism of the second person by the author for holding such views. It&#039;s a kind of half-taboo word, which you can mention but not use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the British SARA corpus, the racial connotations are not so prominent as in the U.S.; but the word seems often to be used in a double-layered way: the author describes someone else as viewing a third person as &#8220;uppity&#8221;; implying a criticism of the second person by the author for holding such views. It&#8217;s a kind of half-taboo word, which you can mention but not use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derry</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2008/09/uppity/comment-page-1/#comment-147350</link>
		<dc:creator>Derry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/?p=2113#comment-147350</guid>
		<description>A quick straw poll seems to confirm my gut feeling that &quot;uppity&quot; is used with class implications, not racist, in British English. One person said &quot;You could use in a racist way if you thought race governed your position.&quot; It smacks of servants and the nouveaux riche.

I&#039;m more worried that I can&#039;t make sense of the sentence. I&#039;m okay up to &quot;class&quot; but who&#039;s the individual and who thinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick straw poll seems to confirm my gut feeling that &#8220;uppity&#8221; is used with class implications, not racist, in British English. One person said &#8220;You could use in a racist way if you thought race governed your position.&#8221; It smacks of servants and the nouveaux riche.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more worried that I can&#8217;t make sense of the sentence. I&#8217;m okay up to &#8220;class&#8221; but who&#8217;s the individual and who thinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
