Comments on: Supreme Court Decides That Patent “Exhaustion” Doctrine Applies To Products That Include “Inventive Aspect” Of Patent (Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.) http://blog.oup.com/2008/06/supreme-court-patent/ Academic insights for the thinking world. Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:42:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Literatari http://blog.oup.com/2008/06/supreme-court-patent/#comment-146289 Literatari Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:38:14 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/?p=1880#comment-146289 The Court's focus on the "inventive aspect" may have been "unanticipated" by the author of this article, but it certainly was not unanticipated by anyone who's been following this case and understands the issues. See http://www.morganfinnegan.com/news/articles_publications/0106/_res/id=File1/CHTLJ_osborne.pdf and http://www.morganfinnegan.com/news/articles_publications/0119/_res/id=sa_File1/OsborneArticle_re_Quanta-v.-LGE.pdf The Court’s focus on the “inventive aspect” may have been “unanticipated” by the author of this article, but it certainly was not unanticipated by anyone who’s been following this case and understands the issues. See
http://www.morganfinnegan.com/news/articles_publications/0106/_res/id=File1/CHTLJ_osborne.pdf

and

http://www.morganfinnegan.com/news/articles_publications/0119/_res/id=sa_File1/OsborneArticle_re_Quanta-v.-LGE.pdf

]]>