Visiting Thomas Jefferson’s Grave
Alfred Brophy is the author of Reparations Pro and Con, which talks about visits to slave cemeteries as one type of reparation for slavery. He is also a contributor to Oxford’s African American National Biography and author of Reconstructing the Dreamland: The Tulsa Riot of 1921. In the article below he looks at the controversy over the right to visit Thomas Jefferson’s grave.
The latest controversy over Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings–the enslaved woman whom Jefferson owned and with whom he, presumably, had several children–erupted last summer when Jefferson descendants had a reunion. While the Hemings descendants came to the reunion, they were not permitted to visit Jefferson’s grave, near Jefferson’s home of Monticello. The cemetery is on land owned by some of Jefferson’s lineal descendants and managed by the Monticello Association.
For years the white descendants of Jefferson have been wary of claims by those who are descended from Sally Hemings that Jefferson is also their ancestor. But as DNA evidence has made the claims that Jefferson and Hemings had children together substantially stronger, the relations between the groups have warmed, in some ways. Yet, as the Dan Barry reported in the New York Times on Monday (“Atop a Hallowed Mountain, Small Steps Toward Healing“), in 2002 the Monticello Association voted in 2002 to not extend membership to Hemings’ descendants. That led to a rift between the two groups.
When the summer 2007 reunion was being planned, a member of the Monticello Association suggested a visit to Jefferson’s graveyard. The request was denied, citing, apparently, the fragile state of the graveyard (especially the grass). And that has led to further hard feelings.
But this is not just a dispute about private property and the rights of property owners to keep the public off their grass. For Virginia, like many states–especially southern states–has a statute that gives the public a right to visit cemeteries. Virginia’s statute is the most comprehensive of any state; it provides for rights of access by relatives of the people buried in the cemetery (“family members and descendants of deceased persons buried there”), as well as researchers (“any person engaging in genealogy research”), so long as they give “reasonable notice to the owner of record or to the occupant of the property or both.” Of course, the landowners can limit the amount of the visits and the time. Virginia law is careful to require that the access be “reasonable and limited to the purposes of visiting graves, maintaining the gravesite or cemetery, or conducting genealogy research.” Va. Code Ann.§ 57.27.1 (1993).
It’s no surprise that no one has mentioned Virginia’s graveyard access statute; it is an ancient and obscure right. Most people believe–with good reason–that private property owners can keep everyone off their land. But this is an unusual exception to that right of private property, what English jurist William Blackstone called the “right of sole and despotic dominion.” It has been recognized consistently by courts and legislatures for generations, although it has also been largely forgotten about.
The Hemings descendants can get access to the grave, if they persist in their request. This may have to end in a lawsuit, which might first settle the long-running claims about whether they are related to Jefferson, then set the terms for access to the cemetery. But lawsuits are costly and so often promote more anger and bitterness than they solve.
This, like almost all disputes, is much better settled outside of court. And it is a chance to remind us all of the many, often forgotten, ways that slavery is connected to our past. In the wake of the Civil War, it was easy to forget how central slavery was to our nation’s economic and cultural development. Many people, North and South, wanted to move on and forget about that national sin. Cemeteries, where we remember our common ancestors, offer a vantage for viewing how connected we all are, black and white, to the institution of slavery.
Perhaps when the Hemings’ descendants visit Jefferson’s grave, they will inspire other families to seek out cemeteries where their ancestors are buried. Perhaps the descendants of President Washington’s slaves will visit the slave cemetery at Mount Vernon. Maybe throughout the south, descendants of enslaved people will be crossing the plantations where their ancestors labored and are buried. The image of descendants of enslaved people visiting plantation cemeteries to honor their ancestors will remind us of our common bonds and our common mission today.
Maybe the best reason for encouraging visits to Mr. Jefferson’s grave is to honor his memory. For I suspect that Jefferson would have wanted his descendants–and a lot of other people, too–to visit his grave. One might gage his attitude by his writings about Virginia’s “natural bridge.” In his _Notes on the State of Virginia_, Jefferson called the natural bridge “the most sublime of nature’s works.” In 1774 he purchased the land in Rockbridge County where the natural bridge is located. Then in 1815, he wrote about the bridge that “I view it in some degree as a public trust, and would on no consideration permit the bridge to be injured, defaced or masked from public view.” Perhaps Jefferson would also consider his grave a public trust, which should be open to view, as well.