<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Words on the Block: Back When &#8220;Movies&#8221; Were Young</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/</link>
	<description>Introducing brilliant authors to the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:43:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: taleswapper</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/comment-page-1/#comment-113750</link>
		<dc:creator>taleswapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/#comment-113750</guid>
		<description>It just makes me wonder why movie survived but talkie did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just makes me wonder why movie survived but talkie did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sarokin</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/comment-page-1/#comment-97954</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sarokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/#comment-97954</guid>
		<description>You may be interested to see my write up on a previous (and now outdated) antedating of &quot;movies&quot; which also had tracked it back to 1911, in the very unchildish Washington Post:

http://firstmention.com/movies.aspx

I&#039;ll have to update the page now, of course, but first there needs to be the obligatory hunt for a use of the word even earlier than 1909.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be interested to see my write up on a previous (and now outdated) antedating of &#8220;movies&#8221; which also had tracked it back to 1911, in the very unchildish Washington Post:</p>
<p><a href="http://firstmention.com/movies.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://firstmention.com/movies.aspx</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to update the page now, of course, but first there needs to be the obligatory hunt for a use of the word even earlier than 1909.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Noun Project &#187; The Troubles of Introducing New Words</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/comment-page-1/#comment-97672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Noun Project &#187; The Troubles of Introducing New Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/#comment-97672</guid>
		<description>[...] Read all about it at: http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read all about it at: <a href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/comment-page-1/#comment-97230</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/#comment-97230</guid>
		<description>A rough parallel is the success of the pronunciation /&#039;sInIm@/ in Britain for &quot;cinema&quot;, which was for a long time the standard term for &quot;movie theatre&quot; there, despite attempts to impose the classicizing pronunciation /kAI&#039;nimA/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rough parallel is the success of the pronunciation /&#8217;sInIm@/ in Britain for &#8220;cinema&#8221;, which was for a long time the standard term for &#8220;movie theatre&#8221; there, despite attempts to impose the classicizing pronunciation /kAI&#8217;nimA/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Words on the Block: Back When “Movies” Were Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/comment-page-1/#comment-97203</link>
		<dc:creator>New Words on the Block: Back When “Movies” Were Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/movies/#comment-97203</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by OUPblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by OUPblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
