<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-Hit Wonders: From Hapax to Googlewhacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/</link>
	<description>Introducing brilliant authors to the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:43:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/comment-page-1/#comment-51621</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/#comment-51621</guid>
		<description>Kerry: &quot;borborygmic&quot; (meaning &#039;characterized by rumblings&#039;) is certainly an unusual word, but it&#039;s not quite nonce: it appears in the Shorter OED as well as the full OED under the entry for &quot;borborygm.&quot; Among other quotes, the OED gives this one from H.G. Wells: &quot;Elephant hunters say that they can tell the proximity of a herd by the borborygmic noises the poor brutes emit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry: &#8220;borborygmic&#8221; (meaning &#8216;characterized by rumblings&#8217;) is certainly an unusual word, but it&#8217;s not quite nonce: it appears in the Shorter OED as well as the full OED under the entry for &#8220;borborygm.&#8221; Among other quotes, the OED gives this one from H.G. Wells: &#8220;Elephant hunters say that they can tell the proximity of a herd by the borborygmic noises the poor brutes emit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerry wood</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/comment-page-1/#comment-51618</link>
		<dc:creator>kerry wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/#comment-51618</guid>
		<description>An adjective I have used from time to time is borborygmic.  The dictionary contains only the noun form, borborygmus.  Would my back formation be considered a nonce word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An adjective I have used from time to time is borborygmic.  The dictionary contains only the noun form, borborygmus.  Would my back formation be considered a nonce word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/comment-page-1/#comment-51341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/#comment-51341</guid>
		<description>To remember the word &quot;nonce&quot; and what it means, simpley lose the &quot;n&quot; and, presto: you have &quot;once&quot;, a word used once. Works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To remember the word &#8220;nonce&#8221; and what it means, simpley lose the &#8220;n&#8221; and, presto: you have &#8220;once&#8221;, a word used once. Works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Belyea</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/comment-page-1/#comment-51015</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Belyea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/#comment-51015</guid>
		<description>&quot;In past weeks I’ve described the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary ...&quot;

I know, I know ... and if you don&#039;t stop, I&#039;m going to have to buy it. Mine is only the 4th Edition.   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In past weeks I’ve described the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I know, I know &#8230; and if you don&#8217;t stop, I&#8217;m going to have to buy it. Mine is only the 4th Edition.   <img src='http://blog.oup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian &#187; One-Hit Wonders: From Hapax to Googlewhacks</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/comment-page-1/#comment-50939</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian &#187; One-Hit Wonders: From Hapax to Googlewhacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/10/hapaxify/#comment-50939</guid>
		<description>[...] M C Ward wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Shorter still supplies entries for every single word in the works of William Shakespeare, the poetry of John Milton, Spenser’s Faerie Queene, and the King James Bible (aka the Authorized Version). &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M C Ward wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Shorter still supplies entries for every single word in the works of William Shakespeare, the poetry of John Milton, Spenser’s Faerie Queene, and the King James Bible (aka the Authorized Version). &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
