<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-234183</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-234183</guid>
		<description>I think hyphens should be used more often to reflect the origins of the word and make it flow better when reading a text.  For example, one could read as &quot;read just&quot; if written without a hyphen in &quot;readjust&quot;, or &quot;reel ect&quot; for &quot;reelect.&quot;  I have seen people (especially American publishers) write commanderinchief, antiestablishment, antiaircraft, preeminent, antiintellectual, and many others where a hyphen was clearly needed to provide clarity and make it easier to read and flow. I am sure there are those who are already writing motherinlaw. When Oxford eliminates hyphens in hypenated words and publishes them, it gives legitimacy and acceptance of those corrupted unhyphenated words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think hyphens should be used more often to reflect the origins of the word and make it flow better when reading a text.  For example, one could read as &#8220;read just&#8221; if written without a hyphen in &#8220;readjust&#8221;, or &#8220;reel ect&#8221; for &#8220;reelect.&#8221;  I have seen people (especially American publishers) write commanderinchief, antiestablishment, antiaircraft, preeminent, antiintellectual, and many others where a hyphen was clearly needed to provide clarity and make it easier to read and flow. I am sure there are those who are already writing motherinlaw. When Oxford eliminates hyphens in hypenated words and publishes them, it gives legitimacy and acceptance of those corrupted unhyphenated words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-155383</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated : OUPblog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-155383</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alexandre Rivest, Alexandre Rivest. Alexandre Rivest said: Apparently the hyphen has been killed from the Enlish language... Sucks. http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alexandre Rivest, Alexandre Rivest. Alexandre Rivest said: Apparently the hyphen has been killed from the Enlish language&#8230; Sucks. <a href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Mignon</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-125738</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Mignon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-125738</guid>
		<description>Can Mr. Zimmer refer me to an essay on the literary history of the hyphenated compound? Please? I know one exists; please help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Mr. Zimmer refer me to an essay on the literary history of the hyphenated compound? Please? I know one exists; please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-54479</link>
		<dc:creator>Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-54479</guid>
		<description>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more subtle type of editorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more subtle type of editorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Informed Reader - WSJ.com : Hyphens Are Vanishing. Blame E-mail. Sorry, Email.</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-50227</link>
		<dc:creator>The Informed Reader - WSJ.com : Hyphens Are Vanishing. Blame E-mail. Sorry, Email.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-50227</guid>
		<description>[...] Ben Zimmer, an editor at the Oxford University Press, gives some slightly reassuring historical background on the case of the missing hyphen:  As modern English has evolved, some compounds have stayed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ben Zimmer, an editor at the Oxford University Press, gives some slightly reassuring historical background on the case of the missing hyphen:  As modern English has evolved, some compounds have stayed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->