<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/</link>
	<description>Introducing brilliant authors to the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:43:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Mignon</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/comment-page-1/#comment-125738</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Mignon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-125738</guid>
		<description>Can Mr. Zimmer refer me to an essay on the literary history of the hyphenated compound? Please? I know one exists; please help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Mr. Zimmer refer me to an essay on the literary history of the hyphenated compound? Please? I know one exists; please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/comment-page-1/#comment-54479</link>
		<dc:creator>Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-54479</guid>
		<description>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more subtle type of editorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more subtle type of editorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Informed Reader - WSJ.com : Hyphens Are Vanishing. Blame E-mail. Sorry, Email.</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/comment-page-1/#comment-50227</link>
		<dc:creator>The Informed Reader - WSJ.com : Hyphens Are Vanishing. Blame E-mail. Sorry, Email.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/hyphens/#comment-50227</guid>
		<description>[...] Ben Zimmer, an editor at the Oxford University Press, gives some slightly reassuring historical background on the case of the missing hyphen:  As modern English has evolved, some compounds have stayed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ben Zimmer, an editor at the Oxford University Press, gives some slightly reassuring historical background on the case of the missing hyphen:  As modern English has evolved, some compounds have stayed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
