<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oomphy Wordsmithery of the Anglosphere: New Entries in the Shorter OED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/</link>
	<description>Academic insights for the thinking world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-54471</link>
		<dc:creator>Extending the History of Words: The Case of "Ms." : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-54471</guid>
		<description>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the hubbub about the new words and disappearing hyphens in the latest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-50177</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lowly Hyphen: Reports of Its Death are Greatly Exaggerated : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-50177</guid>
		<description>[...] much of the surrounding publicity had to do with the all the brand-new material: the 2,500 new words and phrases and 1,300 new illustrative quotes. But what&#8217;s gotten just as much attention is something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much of the surrounding publicity had to do with the all the brand-new material: the 2,500 new words and phrases and 1,300 new illustrative quotes. But what&#8217;s gotten just as much attention is something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Short Takes</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47870</link>
		<dc:creator>KR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Short Takes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47870</guid>
		<description>[...] No waiting until November for this: the sixth edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No waiting until November for this: the sixth edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47037</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47037</guid>
		<description>&quot;dot.com&quot;?  Arrgh.  The mark of the clueless.  It&#039;s &quot;dot-com&quot;; that abortion you have there would have to be pronounced &quot;dot dot com&quot;, which is absurd.

(I know, I know, lexicographers have to follow the crowd, or rather the Hartree-Fock process, by which lexicographers document what publishers do, who in turn do what they think lexicographers are telling them to do.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dot.com&#8221;?  Arrgh.  The mark of the clueless.  It&#8217;s &#8220;dot-com&#8221;; that abortion you have there would have to be pronounced &#8220;dot dot com&#8221;, which is absurd.</p>
<p>(I know, I know, lexicographers have to follow the crowd, or rather the Hartree-Fock process, by which lexicographers document what publishers do, who in turn do what they think lexicographers are telling them to do.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzle Me This: SOED : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47010</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzle Me This: SOED : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/09/anglosphere/#comment-47010</guid>
		<description>[...] Filed in Dictionaries , Blogs , A-Featured , A-Editor&#039;s Picks , Lexicography on September 20, 2007 &#124; Share This   Thanks to the wonderful folks at Jonesin&#8217; Crosswords we have a fun way for you to discover the new words in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. To learn more about the SOED check out Ben Zimmer&#8217;s columns here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filed in Dictionaries , Blogs , A-Featured , A-Editor&#8217;s Picks , Lexicography on September 20, 2007 | Share This   Thanks to the wonderful folks at Jonesin&#8217; Crosswords we have a fun way for you to discover the new words in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. To learn more about the SOED check out Ben Zimmer&#8217;s columns here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->