http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/ Academic insights for the thinking world. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:22:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-153845 Anonymous Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:52:00 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-153845 no one ever mentions the dangers of volitile pestacides gly-phosphate fertaliser's and forien particles breathed deep into lung tissue? no one ever mentions the dangers of volitile pestacides gly-phosphate fertaliser’s and forien particles breathed deep into lung tissue?

]]> http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-147182 jeff Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:36:11 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-147182 i know this is a year old but, asiah, what would be the point if there was no thc. that is the active chemical in cannabis. of course with the thc you will have the short term memory loss and stuff, you get that even from baking with weed but the carcinogens are gone which is the goal. thc is still thc no matter what you do. i know this is a year old but, asiah, what would be the point if there was no thc. that is the active chemical in cannabis. of course with the thc you will have the short term memory loss and stuff, you get that even from baking with weed but the carcinogens are gone which is the goal. thc is still thc no matter what you do.

]]> http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-22384 asiah Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:51:20 +0000 http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/marijuana/#comment-22384 So this is the positive side effects section, but wouldn't the thc introduced into the body still cause the negative side effects aside of the no-longer-existant carcinogen problem? So this is the positive side effects section, but wouldn’t the thc introduced into the body still cause the negative side effects aside of the no-longer-existant carcinogen problem?

]]>