<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Poptastic Geekfest for Infoholics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/</link>
	<description>Introducing brilliant authors to the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:43:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Joy (and Sorrow) of "Schadenfreude" : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/comment-page-1/#comment-40841</link>
		<dc:creator>The Joy (and Sorrow) of "Schadenfreude" : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/#comment-40841</guid>
		<description>[...] combining forms as -holic, -tacular, -thon, and -nomics, as described in my recent column, &#8220;A Poptastic Geekfest for Infoholics.&#8221; What&#8217;s also notable is that these new blended forms don&#8217;t really bother with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] combining forms as -holic, -tacular, -thon, and -nomics, as described in my recent column, &#8220;A Poptastic Geekfest for Infoholics.&#8221; What&#8217;s also notable is that these new blended forms don&#8217;t really bother with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pouring New Wine Into Old Phrasal Bottles : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/comment-page-1/#comment-23432</link>
		<dc:creator>Pouring New Wine Into Old Phrasal Bottles : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/#comment-23432</guid>
		<description>[...] The writer Tom Wolfe coined the phrase radical chic in a 1970 New York article, as a way to poke fun at the affectations of affluent liberals. That spawned a new phrasal template, X chic, and now we have an efflorescence of subcultural fashions. Topping the Corpus list are geek chic, heroin chic, shabby chic, retro chic, urban chic, lesbian chic, casual chic, cheap chic, cutie chic, and porno chic. One online wag has even combined the inner X and X chic templates, exhorting readers to &#8220;embrace your inner geek chic.&#8221; (That&#8217;s geektastic!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The writer Tom Wolfe coined the phrase radical chic in a 1970 New York article, as a way to poke fun at the affectations of affluent liberals. That spawned a new phrasal template, X chic, and now we have an efflorescence of subcultural fashions. Topping the Corpus list are geek chic, heroin chic, shabby chic, retro chic, urban chic, lesbian chic, casual chic, cheap chic, cutie chic, and porno chic. One online wag has even combined the inner X and X chic templates, exhorting readers to &#8220;embrace your inner geek chic.&#8221; (That&#8217;s geektastic!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Short Takes</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/comment-page-1/#comment-20139</link>
		<dc:creator>KR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Short Takes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/#comment-20139</guid>
		<description>[...] What happens when two words combine to form something new? Something pretty linkalicious. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What happens when two words combine to form something new? Something pretty linkalicious. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luca</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/comment-page-1/#comment-19577</link>
		<dc:creator>luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/07/geekfest/#comment-19577</guid>
		<description>Quite interesting. 

How does the Oxford Corpus keep track of spoken english? Do you have an army of typing monkeys with earphones? Do new ways of writing an old word count as neo-logism? Like, sms/chat abbreviations such as B4 or CU L8R?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://gufodotto.blogspot.com/2007/07/newsrotics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Innocent manual backtrack&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting. </p>
<p>How does the Oxford Corpus keep track of spoken english? Do you have an army of typing monkeys with earphones? Do new ways of writing an old word count as neo-logism? Like, sms/chat abbreviations such as B4 or CU L8R?</p>
<p><a href="http://gufodotto.blogspot.com/2007/07/newsrotics.html" rel="nofollow">Innocent manual backtrack</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
