<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Oxford: Book Widgets and Book Selling 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/</link>
	<description>Introducing brilliant authors to the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:43:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My Repository is Bigger Than Yours: A Response to Book Widgets and Book Selling 2.0 : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>My Repository is Bigger Than Yours: A Response to Book Widgets and Book Selling 2.0 : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>[...] Podolsky has written an excellent essay, Book Widgets and Book Selling 2.0 that clearly explains the thinking behind the large scale repository efforts underway at a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Podolsky has written an excellent essay, Book Widgets and Book Selling 2.0 that clearly explains the thinking behind the large scale repository efforts underway at a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibofightback</title>
		<link>http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>ibofightback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oup.com/2007/04/widget/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Amway model has attracted over 4 million people who renew their membership every year. No more than 10-20% of those are actively out promoting Amway products, but it&#039;s still one hell of a big marketing group. 1st level &quot;affiliate marketing&quot; which attempted to take the same model online tends to give small returns. Companies that try to setup multi-level compensation find it&#039;s way harder than it looks to develop a setup that is fair and economically sustainable. Book type affiliate programs like Amazon are single level and notoriously difficult to actually make any meaningful money with. If however you earned a percentage on what others you introduced to the idea, and so on and so on - well, Alticor (Amway&#039;s mother company) paid out something like $2 billion dollars to people for doing that last year, with quite a number of individuals bringing in 7 and 8 figure incomes.  So it&#039;s possible, but I don&#039;t see it happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Amway model has attracted over 4 million people who renew their membership every year. No more than 10-20% of those are actively out promoting Amway products, but it&#8217;s still one hell of a big marketing group. 1st level &#8220;affiliate marketing&#8221; which attempted to take the same model online tends to give small returns. Companies that try to setup multi-level compensation find it&#8217;s way harder than it looks to develop a setup that is fair and economically sustainable. Book type affiliate programs like Amazon are single level and notoriously difficult to actually make any meaningful money with. If however you earned a percentage on what others you introduced to the idea, and so on and so on &#8211; well, Alticor (Amway&#8217;s mother company) paid out something like $2 billion dollars to people for doing that last year, with quite a number of individuals bringing in 7 and 8 figure incomes.  So it&#8217;s possible, but I don&#8217;t see it happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
